NASA faked Apollo moon landings

[DiegoBigo_64]

it doesn't show evidence of man landing on moon, it just shows old photos on studios, grainy, essentially gray, and with traces of fakery, that it why its called refutable

Lunar Reconnaissance Camera: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Maganda na resolution na yan ng camera ng LRO kaya mo lang hindi maappreciate blurred kamo pero hindi kasi ang surface ng moon is almost monochromatic na halos shadows and highlites lang makikita mo at walang masyadong land features. Kahit kunan mo sya ng camera telescope on a clear day ganoon din ang lalabas.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Lunar Reconnaissance Camera: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..
Maganda na resolution na yan ng camera ng LRO kaya mo lang hindi maappreciate blurred kamo pero hindi kasi ang surface ng moon is almost monochromatic na halos shadows and highlites lang makikita mo at walang masyadong land features. Kahit kunan mo sya ng camera telescope on a clear day ganoon din ang lalabas.
View attachment 2913678

anong bang maprove nyan? anong meron dyan? kahit na maglabas ka ng proof na malinaw na may lander, hindi ibig sabihin na may taong naglakad dyan, dahil spaceship lang naglagay nyan dyan, pero sa totoo lang wala namang malinaw na kuha ng LRO ang lander

basahin mo kasi yung mga link sa first page, try to debunked them, yung link na binigay mo hindi naman covered ang mga andun sa links sa first page

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

it doesn't show evidence of man landing on moon, it just shows old photos on studios, grainy, essentially gray, and with traces of fakery, that it why its called refutable

you haven't seen the links on the first page? because its not covered with your debunked link

Medyo dami kasi words sana summarized lang. Anyway...

Moon surface is not level in the first place. The top photo which is the transit map plotted on a plane considering the topography of the moon. There are high valleys, ridges and slopes.

Distance can be measured with consideration for topography

In this sample distance from A to B is equal to distance from C to D. Using Length 1 as yard stick you can get different results by just measuring it at the top without consideration for physical features like, hills, valleys.

I would like to answer all of that pero dami talaga words e.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Medyo dami kasi words sana summarized lang. Anyway...
View attachment 2913680

Moon surface is not level in the first place. The top photo which is the transit map plotted on a plane considering the topography of the moon. There are high valleys, ridges and slopes.

Distance can be measured with consideration for topography
View attachment 2913692

In this sample distance from A to B is equal to distance from C to D. Using Length 1 as yard stick you can get different results by just measuring it at the top without consideration for physical features like, hills, valleys.

I would like to answer all of that pero dami talaga words e.

you did not prove any point here, i dont think you understand the map and correlate it with the picture

"Note landing site marked X, and each individual Station Number. Note Station 2 by the South Massive, which is over 8 kilometres from landing site. Also note Station 8 which is over 4 kilometres in the opposite direction."

then compare it with the picture: "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance". That Lunar Module sure don't look like it's over 8 km away

yung lunar lander ang lapit lang ibig sabihin dahil kitang kita sa picture, based sa map dapat 8km away siya pero ang laki nya as in stone trow away lang, yung 1km nga na truck di mo na makita eh, yang 8km na lander kitang kita sa picture? haha

gets mo? mahirap ka pala talaga makaintindi, kaya pala di mo naintindihan mga laman nung links sa first page

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

you did not prove any point here, i dont think you understand the map and correlate it with the picture

"Note landing site marked X, and each individual Station Number. Note Station 2 by the South Massive, which is over 8 kilometres from landing site. Also note Station 8 which is over 4 kilometres in the opposite direction."

then compare it with the picture: "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance". That Lunar Module sure don't look like it's over 8 km away

yung lunar lander ang lapit lang ibig sabihin dahil kitang kita sa picture, based sa map dapat 8km away siya pero ang laki nya as in stone trow away lang, yung 1km nga na truck di mo na makita eh, yang 8km na lander kitang kita sa picture? haha

gets mo? mahirap ka pala talaga makaintindi, kaya pala di mo naintindihan mga laman nung links sa first page

It is you that do not understand 'topography'
This photo below taken by LRO it is planar in relation to moon without considering topography.

Station 8 North filled with craters so it is heavlly terrained than that of in Tortilla Flat, hence it was called.
Do not accused me naman na hirap ako makaintindi nagpapalitan lang tayo ng sides e.
Maayos nga ako nakikipagusap sa iyo.
Usapang intelehente lang, pareho naman tayong natututo dito e.

 

[rodey_lyf]

It is you that do not understand 'topography'
This photo below taken by LRO it is planar in relation to moon without considering topography.
View attachment 2913845
Station 8 North filled with craters so it is heavlly terrained than that of in Tortilla Flat, hence it was called.
Do not accused me naman na hirap ako makaintindi nagpapalitan lang tayo ng sides e.
Maayos nga ako nakikipagusap sa iyo.
Usapang intelehente lang, pareho naman tayong natututo dito e.

di mo kasi naintindihan talaga, sa mapa yung layo ng station 2 sa landing site kung saan nandun yung lunar module ay around 8km, tapos yung picture sabi ng caption nasa station 2 na sya pero kuha nya sa background ang lunar module na 8km ang layo, pero ang laki nya na parang walking distance lang, di mo talaga ma gets kasi eh, alam mo ba gaano kalayo ang 8km? mapicturan mo ba bahay mo kung 8km ang layo mo? kaya hindi mo talaga maintindihan, ok, common sense lang paps hindi topography ang kailangan

 

[mutagenesisx]

kung kaya man nang spy sat makita nang klaro kahit na kasing liit nang dyaryo, malamang ito ay classified pa. kagaya nang spy sat na meron x-ray, na dekada bago ma de-classify.

troll lang yan sa beijing rodey, wag nyu na pansinin. ako lang ata pwede kumausap dyan.

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

di mo kasi naintindihan talaga, sa mapa yung layo ng station 2 sa landing site kung saan nandun yung lunar module ay around 8km, tapos yung picture sabi ng caption nasa station 2 na sya pero kuha nya sa background ang lunar module na 8km ang layo, pero ang laki nya na parang walking distance lang, di mo talaga ma gets kasi eh, alam mo ba gaano kalayo ang 8km? mapicturan mo ba bahay mo kung 8km ang layo mo? kaya hindi mo talaga maintindihan, ok, common sense lang paps hindi topography ang kailangan

This photo taken by LRO show the same tracks in your op image (NASASCAM) This was taken above the moon and planar plotted with considering the topographic features of the sites. Tortilla Flat is almost even and flat while in the Station 6 area mostly craters and mountains. There they traverse a 800 ft. 20 ° slope. Kaya ganyan lumabas ang plotted tracks.

Physical maps are intended to show natural landforms and features of an area, such as mountains, deserts, lakes, oceans, and rivers. Unlike the topographical map, it does not show contour lines or give exact elevations.

 

[rodey_lyf]

View attachment 2914595

This photo taken by LRO show the same tracks in your op image (NASASCAM) This was taken above the moon and planar plotted with considering the topographic features of the sites. Tortilla Flat is almost even and flat while in the Station 6 area mostly craters and mountains. There they traverse a 800 ft. 20 ° slope. Kaya ganyan lumabas ang plotted tracks.

Physical maps are intended to show natural landforms and features of an area, such as mountains, deserts, lakes, oceans, and rivers. Unlike the topographical map, it does not show contour lines or give exact elevations.

ay ambot, anung pake ko dyan eh ang usapan natin ay yung picture ng naglanding na tao sa moon na nasa background nya ang lunar module na 8km ang layo

red herring fallacy yan ginagawa mo paps

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

ay ambot, anung pake ko dyan eh ang usapan natin ay yung picture ng naglanding na tao sa moon na nasa background nya ang lunar module na 8km ang layo

red herring fallacy yan ginagawa mo paps

Fallacy?

 

[rodey_lyf]

View attachment 2914625
Fallacy?

haha, its very clear, nagkamali sila ng peke, they are in station 2 with lander in the background 8km far, dami stations between that, station 3, 4, etc, the fact that its very clear station 2 binangiit is andun na sila palapag sa station 2, grabe maka isip ng palusot

aminin mu na, di mu naintindihan nung una, tapos ngayon PaLuSut ka pa, haha, halimbawa driver ng mrt train sabihin approaching cubao station pero nasa makati pa cya, eh madami pang stations between makati and cubao, anu un baliw? cyempre pag sinabing approaching cubao station parating na train sa cubao, bababa na yung mga pasahero ng cubao, haha from fakery to comedy

its very clear they faked it

 

[taizi02]

debate ba to o ano?
parang pangpalaki lang ng ulo to e
ok sana kung medyo may laman or entertaining pero hangang una lang.
pero im curious meron bang napabago pananaw dahil sa post na to?

 

[xDopeCypher]

Patambay hahah

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

haha, its very clear, nagkamali sila ng peke, they are in station 2 with lander in the background 8km far, dami stations between that, station 3, 4, etc, the fact that its very clear station 2 binangiit is andun na sila palapag sa station 2, grabe maka isip ng palusot

aminin mu na, di mu naintindihan nung una, tapos ngayon PaLuSut ka pa, haha, halimbawa driver ng mrt train sabihin approaching cubao station pero nasa makati pa cya, eh madami pang stations between makati and cubao, anu un baliw? cyempre pag sinabing approaching cubao station parating na train sa cubao, bababa na yung mga pasahero ng cubao, haha from fakery to comedy

its very clear they faked it

Then show us the original image link na may caption na "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance".
I run thru Apollo 17 Journal transcription and images pero wala nakalagay doon.
Apollo 17 stays on the moon surface for 75 hrs napakadaming communication conversations at images na binasa ko wala akong nakita regarding that statement.
Sobrang detalye ng journal "ALSJ" pati vital signs na kagaya ng heart beat nila nakarecord.
Kung may time kayo basahin nyo:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[rodey_lyf]

Then show us the original image link na may caption na "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance".
I run thru Apollo 17 Journal transcription and images pero wala nakalagay doon.
Apollo 17 stays on the moon surface for 75 hrs napakadaming communication conversations at images na binasa ko wala akong nakita regarding that statement.
Sobrang detalye ng journal "ALSJ" pati vital signs na kagaya ng heart beat nila nakarecord.
Kung may time kayo basahin nyo:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

eto na now lang ako bumisita ulit

talagang nahihirapan ka maski sa paghahanap, ewan ko lang ilang beses na nila inedit yan mga digital sites nila para pagtakpan mga kalokohan nila, pero may matitira pa rin sila na di nila mapagtatakpan

eto oh
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
AS17-135-20550 (OF300) ( You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. )

LRV traverse from the SEP site to Station 2. Approaching the LM.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. Gene's portrait of Station 2 Boulder 2 ( You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. )

The frames in this sequence are AS17-137- You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. to You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Assembled by Karl Dodenhoff.

kung hirap ka talaga, better stay ka nalang sa paniniwala na man landed on moon na nuong 1970s para di ka rin mahirapan, lahat ng sinabi nila sayo mula bata ka stay ka lang dun, parang religion lang yan

 

[jep0y1o1]

conspiracy theory

 

[bigfishy]

Sa tingin ko fake, hayaan mo na babalik naman daw ulet sila doon, this time dapat may live feed na talaga para matapos na lahat ng pagaaway tungkol dito at totally madisprove nadin yung idea ng flatearthers,

 

[rodey_lyf]

Sa tingin ko fake, hayaan mo na babalik naman daw ulet sila doon, this time dapat may live feed na talaga para matapos na lahat ng pagaaway tungkol dito at totally madisprove nadin yung idea ng flatearthers,

actually meron NASA satellite sa moon, yan pinagusapan namin sa previous pages ng thread, madali lang nila patunayan kung totoo ang pagtalun talun at lakad lakad ni Neil A (A lieN) sa moon, kaso puro labo nilalatag nila dahil hirap nila patunayan pag malinaw, cyempre ingat din sila sa bawat lies nila, more lies to cover lies

may plano talaga sila maglapag ng tao sa moon for real this year 2024 nga sana kaso nahihirapan sila kaya di pa sure kelan talaga, kasi nga hindi na nila mapeke so kailangang totoo na

conspiracy theory

basahin mo muna paps mga links sa first page para makapagcomment ka ng tama

debate ba to o ano?
parang pangpalaki lang ng ulo to e
ok sana kung medyo may laman or entertaining pero hangang una lang.
pero im curious meron bang napabago pananaw dahil sa post na to?

basahin mo paps mga links sa first page baka ikaw una maconvince, pero kung ayaw mo basahin lahat, stay ka lang sa old paniniwala mo

dekada bago ma de-classify.

troll lang yan sa beijing rodey, wag nyu na pansinin. ako lang ata pwede kumausap dyan.

2026 puede na ma de classify ang moon landing fakery files na classified under Pres Johnson, kung dead na lahat ang astronauts as part of declassification rule

 

[DiegoBigo_64]

Akala ko you had enough of me na, kasi tagal mo di nag-reply. Ayoko na sanang i-post ito kasi kung baga sa kumunoy kapag naggagalaw ka lalo kang lulubog.

Eto yung claim ng You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. na picture na sinasabing photograph on right is from ALSJ. Text accompanying this picture states: "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance".

Kagaya ng sinabi ko nung una sobrang dami ng transcribed communications for the Apollo 17, three days sila doon at halos 75 hrs yung commu nila.
Yung gumawa ng NASASCAM gumawa sya ng sariling istorya.

Eto anf totoong trancription ng nasabing picture na ALSJ nya kinuha eto yung link: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Eto ang totoong texto.

Nakalagay "Approaching the LM at hindi approaching Station 2. Click nyo yung (81k or 802k) para makita nyo yung same picture na ginamit ni (NASASCAM)

Very clear na he made up a story regarding that picture.
He is a hopeless deceiver.
And some fall for it.

Anyway, maybe nga you already had enough of me.
Thanks for the convo pede pa naman tayong magusap sa ibang topic dito sa PHC.
Thanks bro!

 

[rodey_lyf]

Akala ko you had enough of me na, kasi tagal mo di nag-reply. Ayoko na sanang i-post ito kasi kung baga sa kumunoy kapag naggagalaw ka lalo kang lulubog.

Eto yung claim ng You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. na picture na sinasabing photograph on right is from ALSJ. Text accompanying this picture states: "Approaching Station 2 with LM shown in distance".
View attachment 2923896

Kagaya ng sinabi ko nung una sobrang dami ng transcribed communications for the Apollo 17, three days sila doon at halos 75 hrs yung commu nila.
Yung gumawa ng NASASCAM gumawa sya ng sariling istorya.

Eto anf totoong trancription ng nasabing picture na ALSJ nya kinuha eto yung link: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Eto ang totoong texto.
View attachment 2923900
Nakalagay "Approaching the LM at hindi approaching Station 2. Click nyo yung (81k or 802k) para makita nyo yung same picture na ginamit ni (NASASCAM)

Very clear na he made up a story regarding that picture.
He is a hopeless deceiver.
And some fall for it.

Anyway, maybe nga you already had enough of me.
Thanks for the convo pede pa naman tayong magusap sa ibang topic dito sa PHC.
Thanks bro!

sorry to say pero ikaw ang na deceive ng NASA paps, of course they already edited those, since 1960s they carefully planned the fakery tapos from 1970s up to now they carefully created evidences for their fakery, madaming brainstorming sessions ginawa nila, they start releasing pictures in 1999 to support their fakery, pero nung 1970s konti lang mga pictures maipakita nila(see attached image), thousands of brainstorming sessions ginawa nila kaya medyo mahirapan ka to spot the fakery, pero ang nasascam site nung 1990s pa yan, if you read sana yung buong mga links you will understand, pero it seems ayaw mo talaga basahin lahat, kasi most of your questions andun sagot sa mga links like these ones
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
The truth, and reason, why NASA faked the Apollo Moon missions.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Misleading data regarding the Apollo missions.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Facts to be considered about Apollo, plus a Q and A section.

sabi mo di mo nakita yung image, so i showed you, well just stay ka sa paniniwala mo, i hope lalabas ang katotohanan in the coming years

proof na edited ang ALSJ
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
The Journal is, in Neil Armstrong's words, a "living document" and is constantly being modified and updated.