appocalips
Addict
ganyan talaga sa kapapanood ng fantasy movie ayan na sya na si lion king siguro ang lolo nyan yung mammoth yung elephant sa ice age
Do you believe that the bible is authentic?open na po sa gustong mag-share.
- Thread starter Thea18
- Start date
Ikaw unggoy hindi pa nageevolve maging tao. Circle daw ang earth sabi ng bibliya. Ano bang geometric shape ng circle? E di flat! Magbasa ka. Bibliya na lang alam mo hindi mo pa alam.
Why we are born to believe in God: It's wired into the brain, says psychologist
By Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail
Sep 2009
Humans are programmed to believe in God because it gives them a better chance of survival, researchers claim.
A study into the way children's brains develop suggests that during the process of evolution those with religious tendencies began to benefit from their beliefs - possibly by working in groups to ensure the future of their community.
The findings of Bruce Hood, professor of developmental psychology at Bristol University, suggest that magical and supernatural beliefs are hardwired into our brains from birth, and that religions are therefore tapping into a powerful psychological force.
All in the mind: Scientists have claimed we are born to believe in God
All in the mind: Scientists have claimed we are born to believe in God
His work is supported by other researchers who have found evidence linking religious feelings and experience to particular regions of the brain.
They suggest people are programmed to receive a feeling of spirituality from electrical activity in these areas.
The findings challenge atheists such as Richard Dawkins, the author of The God Delusion, who has long argued that religious beliefs result from poor education and childhood 'indoctrination'.
Professor Hood believes it is futile to try to get people to abandon their beliefs because these come from such a 'fundamental level'.
'Our research shows children have a natural, intuitive way of reasoning that leads them to all kinds of supernatural beliefs about how the world works,' he said.
'As they grow up they overlay these beliefs with more rational approaches but the tendency to illogical supernatural beliefs remains as religion.'
The professor, who will present his findings at the British Science Association's annual meeting this week, sees organised religion as just part of a spectrum of supernatural beliefs.
Religious feelings: Shaolin monks who practise meditation have been linked to showing religious sensations in parts of the brain
Religious feelings: Shaolin monks who practise meditation have been linked to showing religious sensations in parts of the brain
In one study he found even ardent atheists balked at the idea of accepting an organ transplant from a murderer, because of a superstitious belief that an individual's personality could be stored in his or her organs.
To reinforce his point, Professor Hood produced a blue cardigan during a lecture and invited the audience to put it on, for a £10 reward. This prompted a sea of raised hands to volunteer.
He then said that the notorious murderer Fred West wore the cardigan, causing most to put their hand down.
Although it was merely a stunt - the cardigan was not West's - the professor said this showed that even the most rational of people can be irrationally made to feel uncomfortable.
Another experiment involved asking subjects to cut up a treasured photograph. When his team then measured their sweat production - which is what lie-detector tests monitor - there was a jump in the reading. This did not occur when destroying an object of less sentimental significance.
'This shows how superstition is hardwired into our brains,' he added.
The Rev Michael Reiss, professor of science education at London University's Institute of Education and an Anglican priest, said he saw no reason why such research should undermine religious belief. 'We are evolved creatures and the whole point about humanity is that we are rooted in the natural world.'
By Arthur Martin for the Daily Mail
Sep 2009
Humans are programmed to believe in God because it gives them a better chance of survival, researchers claim.
A study into the way children's brains develop suggests that during the process of evolution those with religious tendencies began to benefit from their beliefs - possibly by working in groups to ensure the future of their community.
The findings of Bruce Hood, professor of developmental psychology at Bristol University, suggest that magical and supernatural beliefs are hardwired into our brains from birth, and that religions are therefore tapping into a powerful psychological force.
All in the mind: Scientists have claimed we are born to believe in God
All in the mind: Scientists have claimed we are born to believe in God
His work is supported by other researchers who have found evidence linking religious feelings and experience to particular regions of the brain.
They suggest people are programmed to receive a feeling of spirituality from electrical activity in these areas.
The findings challenge atheists such as Richard Dawkins, the author of The God Delusion, who has long argued that religious beliefs result from poor education and childhood 'indoctrination'.
Professor Hood believes it is futile to try to get people to abandon their beliefs because these come from such a 'fundamental level'.
'Our research shows children have a natural, intuitive way of reasoning that leads them to all kinds of supernatural beliefs about how the world works,' he said.
'As they grow up they overlay these beliefs with more rational approaches but the tendency to illogical supernatural beliefs remains as religion.'
The professor, who will present his findings at the British Science Association's annual meeting this week, sees organised religion as just part of a spectrum of supernatural beliefs.
Religious feelings: Shaolin monks who practise meditation have been linked to showing religious sensations in parts of the brain
Religious feelings: Shaolin monks who practise meditation have been linked to showing religious sensations in parts of the brain
In one study he found even ardent atheists balked at the idea of accepting an organ transplant from a murderer, because of a superstitious belief that an individual's personality could be stored in his or her organs.
To reinforce his point, Professor Hood produced a blue cardigan during a lecture and invited the audience to put it on, for a £10 reward. This prompted a sea of raised hands to volunteer.
He then said that the notorious murderer Fred West wore the cardigan, causing most to put their hand down.
Although it was merely a stunt - the cardigan was not West's - the professor said this showed that even the most rational of people can be irrationally made to feel uncomfortable.
Another experiment involved asking subjects to cut up a treasured photograph. When his team then measured their sweat production - which is what lie-detector tests monitor - there was a jump in the reading. This did not occur when destroying an object of less sentimental significance.
'This shows how superstition is hardwired into our brains,' he added.
The Rev Michael Reiss, professor of science education at London University's Institute of Education and an Anglican priest, said he saw no reason why such research should undermine religious belief. 'We are evolved creatures and the whole point about humanity is that we are rooted in the natural world.'
appocalips
Addict
PERO kwento lolo basyang
- TS TS
- #1,386
So ibig sabihin bastat walang side CIRCLE yon... Inulit ko lang ehBastat ang alam ko ang Circle walang side
appocalips
Addict
asan na pakita mo agimat mo unngoy nang bibintang na ang unngoy wawa nmn walang alam sa history ng tao ano ba yan lolo basyang
- TS TS
- #1,388
Nadagdagan uli yong kakampi ko...nice info.maam.thanks.
New research rejects 80-year theory of 'primordial soup' as the origin of life
Date:February 3, 2010
Source:Wiley-Blackwell
For 80 years it has been accepted that early life began in a 'primordial soup' of organic molecules before evolving out of the oceans millions of years later. Today the 'soup' theory has been over turned in a pioneering paper in BioEssays which claims it was the Earth's chemical energy, from hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor, which kick-started early life.
"Textbooks have it that life arose from organic soup and that the first cells grew by fermenting these organics to generate energy in the form of ATP. We provide a new perspective on why that old and familiar view won't work at all," said team leader Dr Nick lane from University College London. "We present the alternative that life arose from gases (H2, CO2, N2, and H2S) and that the energy for first life came from harnessing geochemical gradients created by mother Earth at a special kind of deep-sea hydrothermal vent -- one that is riddled with tiny interconnected compartments or pores."
The soup theory was proposed in 1929 when J.B.S Haldane published his influential essay on the origin of life in which he argued that UV radiation provided the energy to convert methane, ammonia and water into the first organic compounds in the oceans of the early earth. However critics of the soup theory point out that there is no sustained driving force to make anything react; and without an energy source, life as we know it can't exist.
"Despite bioenergetic and thermodynamic failings the 80-year-old concept of primordial soup remains central to mainstream thinking on the origin of life," said senior author, William Martin, an evolutionary biologist from the Insitute of Botany III in Düsseldorf. "But soup has no capacity for producing the energy vital for life."
In rejecting the soup theory the team turned to the Earth's chemistry to identify the energy source which could power the first primitive predecessors of living organisms: geochemical gradients across a honeycomb of microscopic natural caverns at hydrothermal vents. These catalytic cells generated lipids, proteins and nucleotides which may have given rise to the first true cells.
The team focused on ideas pioneered by geochemist Michael J. Russell, on alkaline deep sea vents, which produce chemical gradients very similar to those used by almost all living organisms today -- a gradient of protons over a membrane. Early organisms likely exploited these gradients through a process called chemiosmosis, in which the proton gradient is used to drive synthesis of the universal energy currency, ATP, or simpler equivalents. Later on cells evolved to generate their own proton gradient by way of electron transfer from a donor to an acceptor. The team argue that the first donor was hydrogen and the first acceptor was CO2.
"Modern living cells have inherited the same size of proton gradient, and, crucially, the same orientation -- positive outside and negative inside -- as the inorganic vesicles from which they arose" said co-author John Allen, a biochemist at Queen Mary, University of London.
"Thermodynamic constraints mean that chemiosmosis is strictly necessary for carbon and energy metabolism in all organisms that grow from simple chemical ingredients [autotrophy] today, and presumably the first free-living cells," said Lane. "Here we consider how the earliest cells might have harnessed a geochemically created force and then learned to make their own."
This was a vital transition, as chemiosmosis is the only mechanism by which organisms could escape from the vents. "The reason that all organisms are chemiosmotic today is simply that they inherited it from the very time and place that the first cells evolved -- and they could not have evolved without it," said Martin.
"Far from being too complex to have powered early life, it is nearly impossible to see how life could have begun without chemiosmosis," concluded Lane. "It is time to cast off the shäçkles of fermentation in some primordial soup as 'life without oxygen' -- an idea that dates back to a time before anybody in biology had any understanding of how ATP is made
Date:February 3, 2010
Source:Wiley-Blackwell
For 80 years it has been accepted that early life began in a 'primordial soup' of organic molecules before evolving out of the oceans millions of years later. Today the 'soup' theory has been over turned in a pioneering paper in BioEssays which claims it was the Earth's chemical energy, from hydrothermal vents on the ocean floor, which kick-started early life.
"Textbooks have it that life arose from organic soup and that the first cells grew by fermenting these organics to generate energy in the form of ATP. We provide a new perspective on why that old and familiar view won't work at all," said team leader Dr Nick lane from University College London. "We present the alternative that life arose from gases (H2, CO2, N2, and H2S) and that the energy for first life came from harnessing geochemical gradients created by mother Earth at a special kind of deep-sea hydrothermal vent -- one that is riddled with tiny interconnected compartments or pores."
The soup theory was proposed in 1929 when J.B.S Haldane published his influential essay on the origin of life in which he argued that UV radiation provided the energy to convert methane, ammonia and water into the first organic compounds in the oceans of the early earth. However critics of the soup theory point out that there is no sustained driving force to make anything react; and without an energy source, life as we know it can't exist.
"Despite bioenergetic and thermodynamic failings the 80-year-old concept of primordial soup remains central to mainstream thinking on the origin of life," said senior author, William Martin, an evolutionary biologist from the Insitute of Botany III in Düsseldorf. "But soup has no capacity for producing the energy vital for life."
In rejecting the soup theory the team turned to the Earth's chemistry to identify the energy source which could power the first primitive predecessors of living organisms: geochemical gradients across a honeycomb of microscopic natural caverns at hydrothermal vents. These catalytic cells generated lipids, proteins and nucleotides which may have given rise to the first true cells.
The team focused on ideas pioneered by geochemist Michael J. Russell, on alkaline deep sea vents, which produce chemical gradients very similar to those used by almost all living organisms today -- a gradient of protons over a membrane. Early organisms likely exploited these gradients through a process called chemiosmosis, in which the proton gradient is used to drive synthesis of the universal energy currency, ATP, or simpler equivalents. Later on cells evolved to generate their own proton gradient by way of electron transfer from a donor to an acceptor. The team argue that the first donor was hydrogen and the first acceptor was CO2.
"Modern living cells have inherited the same size of proton gradient, and, crucially, the same orientation -- positive outside and negative inside -- as the inorganic vesicles from which they arose" said co-author John Allen, a biochemist at Queen Mary, University of London.
"Thermodynamic constraints mean that chemiosmosis is strictly necessary for carbon and energy metabolism in all organisms that grow from simple chemical ingredients [autotrophy] today, and presumably the first free-living cells," said Lane. "Here we consider how the earliest cells might have harnessed a geochemically created force and then learned to make their own."
This was a vital transition, as chemiosmosis is the only mechanism by which organisms could escape from the vents. "The reason that all organisms are chemiosmotic today is simply that they inherited it from the very time and place that the first cells evolved -- and they could not have evolved without it," said Martin.
"Far from being too complex to have powered early life, it is nearly impossible to see how life could have begun without chemiosmosis," concluded Lane. "It is time to cast off the shäçkles of fermentation in some primordial soup as 'life without oxygen' -- an idea that dates back to a time before anybody in biology had any understanding of how ATP is made
bat kay isaias lang na verse kayo nagcacamping? From Genesis to Revelation nakasulat at naghaharmonize ang kabuohang katangian ng flat earth.
Not until matignan kung ano nga ba ang nasasaad sa bibliya, itong link magandang resources to start with.
Nakakatuwa na maririnig nyo na ang earth ay flat, kasi simula bata palang ay tinuruan tayo na isang empty and void, nagkaroon ng malakas na pagsabog billion billion billion billion billion billion billion billion years ago, at nagkaroon ng mga bilog bilog na mga planeta at umiiikot sa solar system, isang germs na nagevolve sa halaman, uggoy na nagmula ang tao, earth na nagrorotate ng 1000mph na di mo napapansin, bilog na mundo na makikita mo lagi sa telebisyon at media.
Ngayong may tamang pag iisip kana at judgement sa tinuro sa iyo nung bata kapa, madidistinguish mo kaya kung ano ang totoo sa mga kasinungalingan?
"it's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled" - Mark Twain
Lets-All-Love-Lain
Eternal Poster
babasa kase kayo sabi kase sa bible 4 corners of the earth tapos circle pa. alam ko kase walang corner ung circle per say pero di nga perfect sphere daw mundo eh. isip isip rin minsan.
tsaka search nyo rin ung pre historic temple na goblikitepe na sinsasabi na religion nag simula lahat bago agriculture
tsaka search nyo rin ung pre historic temple na goblikitepe na sinsasabi na religion nag simula lahat bago agriculture
Bakit bilog yong mga kalapit planeta ng earth tapos yong sa atin lang ang flat?wala bang epekto yan sa gravity ng bawat isa sa solar system?yong space X magpapadala na raw ng tao sa outer space siguro naman makikita niyo na talaga kung flat ba talaga o bilog ang mundo.
O kaya mas maganda kung may mayaman na flat earthers sa mundo magpadala sila ng kahit isa para siya mismo makita niya kung ano hugis ng mundo.
O kaya mas maganda kung may mayaman na flat earthers sa mundo magpadala sila ng kahit isa para siya mismo makita niya kung ano hugis ng mundo.
PsiponHandler
Eternal Poster
Oh eto sa mga flat earthers
Isaiah 40:22 New International Version (NIV)
22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth,
and its people are like grasshoppers.
He stretches out the heavens like a canopy,
and spreads them out like a tent to live in.
common sense yung mga movies diba bilog yung earth hay nako naman edi wag na kayo manuod ng movie mga flat ang ulo
Isaiah 40:22 New International Version (NIV)
22 He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth,
and its people are like grasshoppers.
He stretches out the heavens like a canopy,
and spreads them out like a tent to live in.
common sense yung mga movies diba bilog yung earth hay nako naman edi wag na kayo manuod ng movie mga flat ang ulo
Hay naku buhay pa pala yang issue ng 4 corners of the Earth dito, eh basic understanding lang naman na ang 4 corners na binanggit ay tumutukoy sa direksyon o point of reference or location, at hindi sinasabi dyan ang topograpiya o kalagayan ng kalupaan noon! dyuskopo.
Pag sinabi ko bang nangalat ang mga tupa sa mga apat na sulok ng mundo sa mga hangganan ng lupa(wakas ng lupa hindi edge ha) e fake N.E.W.S na ba agad ang sinabi ng mayakda yan.
Ang N.E.W.S po na nabanggit ay tumutukoy sa 4 cardinal directions of the earth if referring to location
at yun ay ang
N.orth
E.ast
W.est
S.outh
Pag sinabi ko bang nangalat ang mga tupa sa mga apat na sulok ng mundo sa mga hangganan ng lupa(wakas ng lupa hindi edge ha) e fake N.E.W.S na ba agad ang sinabi ng mayakda yan.
Ang N.E.W.S po na nabanggit ay tumutukoy sa 4 cardinal directions of the earth if referring to location
at yun ay ang
N.orth
E.ast
W.est
S.outh
uploader74
Forum Veteran
Vanch1018 share ko lang,
People are born to believe in a Higher Being (Spiritual) as they grow up.
It''s really wired in the heart.
Even Without being educated by religious matters, they end up worshiping something or someone.
People are born to believe in a Higher Being (Spiritual) as they grow up.
It''s really wired in the heart.
Even Without being educated by religious matters, they end up worshiping something or someone.
uploader74
Forum Veteran
The Bible is Authentic.
The proofs are googable.
All we got to do is have TIME to read them logically.
If you have doubts, post your questions here,
and people will help.
Basta wala "foolish question" - I may not entertain that.
The proofs are googable.
All we got to do is have TIME to read them logically.
If you have doubts, post your questions here,
and people will help.
Basta wala "foolish question" - I may not entertain that.
Similar threads
-
Trivia Ang malaking pagkakamali ng sabihin na Tupad sa iglesia ni Cristo 1914 ang Juan 10:16.
- Started by Dave457
- Replies: 3
-
Solomon and The Witch Are Also in The Sacred Text
- Started by Asherah Goddess
- Replies: 0
-
The White and Black Magic, and Summoning Demon (A Little Bit Information)
- Started by Asherah Goddess
- Replies: 0
-
I Have a Question. Ngayon Ko Lang Na Realize. Ito Ba Ang Reason Why Some People Don't Like Feminism?
- Started by Asherah Goddess
- Replies: 5
-
Popular Tags
about
amen
ang
april
as
atheist
belief
beliefs
bible
bible verse
bible verses
christianity
daily
day
diyos
faith
father
gentleman007
god
grimlifehacks
heaven
heavenly father
in
january
jesus
life
love
march
mass
only
people
personal
philippine folklore
prayer
psalms
reading
readings
religion
sagot ng bibliya
savior
that
the bible
trivia
verse
verses
way
what
why
you
your
Users search this thread by keywords
- atheist delusions