ART OR BLASPHEMY (PURA LUKA VEGA)

[jayendecastro]

nagsalita na daw si god boss, pinasulat daw 2000 years ago (omnipotent) hehe at blasphemy daw naging impression niya sa ginawa ni pura luka vega

Di lang sguro si luka damay dun.. pati mga nakijamming sa ama namin remix…


Skrrt skrrrrt…

 

[GildartsTale]

Bakit parang parehas lang kayo ng sensitivity level ng mga woke snowflakes sa tono mo. Was it even meant to offend christians? Every year naman nag iimpersonate na Kristo ang mga deboto, why do you specifically have this much hate on this guy?

Was it even meant to offend? Probably to Loka hindi. The point I am trying to say, this rainbow snowflakes misrepresent Christ. Why assume that I hate this guy? Kayo nga when someone misrepresent your view nag rereact.

Ano magagawa mo kung christiano yan nag post niyan? The way you frame this as mockery against the "weak christians" exposes your delusion na sainyo umiikot ang mundo.

Ako ba nag sabi na weak ang christian? Hahahah. Basa2 din.

 

[plhbg1]

Di lang sguro si luka damay dun.. pati mga nakijamming sa ama namin remix…


Skrrt skrrrrt…

oo nga maski ako pinapatugtug ko din ama namin remix especially yung trapmix by sickbeats version, so am i mocking their god din?

Ako ba nag sabi na weak ang christian? Hahahah. Basa2 din.

pa-victim kasi yung christians lagi boss, kunwari pini-peresecute daw haha pwedeng pabida naman kayo kesa pa-victim hehe

 

[GildartsTale]

oo nga maski ako pinapatugtug ko din ama namin remix especially yung trapmix by sickbeats version, so am i mocking their god din?

pa-victim kasi yung christians lagi boss, kunwari pini-peresecute daw haha pwedeng pabida naman kayo kesa pa-victim hehe

Paanong pa victim? Hahahah. San jan ang pan victim? Simply stating some facts pa victim?

Mema lang?

Art is subjective.

mas maganda jan intayin natin ung statement ni god at jesus….


…

…

…

…. ….

wala ata

Yeah, Art is Subjective.

But modern woke expression of art is garbage IMHO.

..

..

..

..

..

..

Why wait? The Bible is there to tell you what is blasphemous or not.

 

[jayendecastro]

Paanong pa victim? Hahahah. San jan ang pan victim? Simply stating some facts pa victim?

Mema lang?



Yeah, Art is Subjective.

But modern woke expression of art is garbage IMHO.

..

..

..

..

..

..

Why wait? The Bible is there to tell you what is blasphemous or not.

Garbage to you might be beauty in some, in terms of art ofcors

The bible is there nga pala… so whats the punishment for being gay?? For being blasphemous??

Can u enlighten us??

Paanong pa victim? Hahahah. San jan ang pan victim? Simply stating some facts pa victim?

Mema lang?



Yeah, Art is Subjective.

But modern woke expression of art is garbage IMHO.

..

..

..

..

..

..

Why wait? The Bible is there to tell you what is blasphemous or not.

Hmmm pavictim… uhhhm.. like claiming the persecution of “fake christians” as your own??? Pd ba yan sa pavictim??

 

[plhbg1]

Paanong pa victim? Hahahah. San jan ang pan victim? Simply stating some facts pa victim?

obvious naman na walang kinalaman ang christians sa event na iyon pero pilit kayong makipagsiksikan as a vicitm kasi christians are meant to be persecuted daw char haha other religions don't play pa-victim role, bakit? kasi they can successfully defend themselves right there and then

 

[GildartsTale]

Garbage to you might be beauty in some, in terms of art ofcors

The bible is there nga pala… so whats the punishment for being gay?? For being blasphemous??

Can u enlighten us??

Am I talking about Gay? Have I mentioned LGTV+++? Read again.

Garbage to you might be beauty in some, in terms of art ofcors

The bible is there nga pala… so whats the punishment for being gay?? For being blasphemous??

Can u enlighten us??


Hmmm pavictim… uhhhm.. like claiming the persecution of “fake christians” as your own??? Pd ba yan sa pavictim??

Who's claiming Christians as our own? They are considered christians, I am just against them. So?

obvious naman na walang kinalaman ang christians sa event na iyon pero pilit kayong makipagsiksikan as a vicitm kasi christians are meant to be persecuted daw char haha other religions don't play pa-victim role, bakit? kasi they can successfully defend themselves right there and then

Panong hindi obvious? Na Luka himself said it was a form of "worship" daw. And He is dressing like Christ. Bulag ka ata.

 

[plhbg1]

Panong hindi obvious? Na Luka himself said it was a form of "worship" daw. And He is dressing like Christ. Bulag ka ata.

if i establish a religion and i like to feature an anti-christ doctrine for my religion, bawal ba? may kinalaman pa din ba ako sa christians? or pa-victim lang talaga hehe

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

Was it even meant to offend? Probably to Loka hindi. The point I am trying to say, this rainbow snowflakes misrepresent Christ. Why assume that I hate this guy? Kayo nga when someone misrepresent your view nag rereact.

Ano ba tamang interpretation ng christ? Kahit nga ung mga author ng Bibliya hindi nagtugma. Bawat sekta hindi nag tugma. Sa madaling sabi puro blasphemy lahat yan?
Sabagay kahit nga si Kristo inakusahan ng blasphemy. At least nakuha nya ung part na iyon hnd ba?

Kayo nga when someone misrepresent your view nag rereact.

Sinong "kami"..

 

[jayendecastro]

Am I talking about Gay? Have I mentioned LGTV+++? Read again.


Who's claiming Christians as our own? They are considered christians, I am just against them. So?


Panong hindi obvious? Na Luka himself said it was a form of "worship" daw. And He is dressing like Christ. Bulag ka ata.

Nope.. u didnt… im just inserting sa discussion kasi its a fact nman na si pura luka is gay… im just asking kung ano punishment ng gays according to the bible…. Just as i am asking kung ano punishment sa blasphemy at its finest nga kamo as per ur book…

Its in there nman db?? Share mo na lang…. Dont worry hindi about homophobia ang gusto ko ipoint out dito…

Who's claiming Christians as our own? They are considered christians, I am just against them. So?

Which christian denomination ung tingin mo subject jan ni pura luka?? Alam mo namn yan db kung sino… and isa mga un sa kinonsider mo na fake christians right?? So whats ur point if someone is mocking fake christians?? Ur the one nag set ng “fake christians” category db??

 

[GildartsTale]

Nope.. u didnt… im just inserting sa discussion kasi its a fact nman na si pura luka is gay… im just asking kung ano punishment ng gays according to the bible…. Just as i am asking kung ano punishment sa blasphemy at its finest nga kamo as per ur book…

Its in there nman db?? Share mo na lang…. Dont worry hindi about homophobia ang gusto ko ipoint out dito…

If you had back read my comment. What I only said, is Pura Luka is misrepresenting Christ that's all.

Ano ba tamang interpretation ng christ? Kahit nga ung mga author ng Bibliya hindi nagtugma. Bawat sekta hindi nag tugma. Sa madaling sabi puro blasphemy lahat yan?
Sabagay kahit nga si Kristo inakusahan ng blasphemy. At least nakuha nya ung part na iyon hnd ba?

The Christ who advocates true acts of holy worship is not the same as this world. Not this charlatan who disguises himself as Christ. The Bible is clear about who Christ is. As clear as day.


Same nga "inakusahan". But the substance on which "inaakusahan" is night and day.

Sinong "kami"..

you basically have buddies here in the comment section

Which christian denomination ung tingin mo subject jan ni pura luka?? Alam mo namn yan db kung sino… and isa mga un sa kinonsider mo na fake christians right?? So whats ur point if someone is mocking fake christians?? Ur the one nag set ng “fake christians” category db??

Ako nga nag seset ng fake Christian category, as if this does not exist.

The point this charlatan Pura Luka dresses like Christ. So? I am not allowed to react on it?

if i establish a religion and i like to feature an anti-christ doctrine for my religion, bawal ba? may kinalaman pa din ba ako sa christians? or pa-victim lang talaga hehe

Hahahah. LOL. bulag ka talaga. Mag basa kasi ng news, at sa mga post nya. Ako nlang mag search para sayo.

"My intention was really never to mock per se. In my mind, queerness has always been there and I feel like it’s my way of actually praising God. I was very careful when I did that because I don’t want to come across something that’s very offensive, "
- Pura Luka

 

[jayendecastro]

If you had back read my comment. What I only said, is Pura Luka is misrepresenting Christ that's all.

Thats all ba?? Hmmmm

See this is what I am saying. Christians are always mocked for what they believe. This is blasphemy at its finest. It is offensive in the sense Woke Marxist Pura Luka is misrepresenting Christ.

Which version of christ is he misrepresenting actually?? And how did he do so??

He is misrepresenting a version of christ from “fake christians” na i guess since fake sila for you eh basically its a misrepresentation of a misrepresentation…

Christians are always mocked eh fake christians nga for you ang target nung kay pura luka… inaangkin mo na nmn as “always mocked na christians”

Ako nga nag seset ng fake Christian category, as if this does not exist.

The point this charlatan Pura Luka dresses like Christ. So? I am not allowed to react on it?

Ur allowed to.. may nagbabawal ba?? Ung reaction mo kasi mismo ang flawed… tinatawag mo ngang fake tapos ung mockery towards them pangangalandakan mo na “eto sinasbi ko christians are always mocked”… thats such hypocrisy

Asan na ung bible punishments?? U do know them right??

 

[plhbg1]

Hahahah. LOL. bulag ka talaga. Mag basa kasi ng news, at sa mga post nya. Ako nlang mag search para sayo.

"My intention was really never to mock per se. In my mind, queerness has always been there and I feel like it’s my way of actually praising God. I was very careful when I did that because I don’t want to come across something that’s very offensive, "
- Pura Luka

ahaha the quotes actually supports my argument that it was indeed a religion (way of worship) and it featured praising god in a different way (doctrine), kaya nga sabi ko sa iyo magtatayo din ako ng religion ko and i like to feature anti-christ doctrine, bawal ba?

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

The Christ who advocates true acts of holy worship is not the same as this world. Not this charlatan who disguises himself as Christ. The Bible is clear about who Christ is. As clear as day.

But everyone imagines Jesus differently. If you really read the Bible with open mind, including this warm and fuzzy Jesus of your imagination is also a misinterpretation. Try it.

Same nga "inakusahan". But the substance on which "inaakusahan" is night and day.

How is that different? This Jews accusing Jesus is just as convinced that they are about truth just as much as you are.

It is just pure arrogance if you can think there is a night and day difference here.

 

[jayendecastro]

How is that different? This Jews accusing Jesus is just as convinced that they are about truth just as much as you are.

Truth and “fake”.

 

[GildartsTale]

Thats all ba?? Hmmmm

Which version of christ is he misrepresenting actually?? And how did he do so??

He is misrepresenting a version of christ from “fake christians” na i guess since fake sila for you eh basically its a misrepresentation of a misrepresentation…

Christians are always mocked eh fake christians nga for you ang target nung kay pura luka… inaangkin mo na nmn as “always mocked na christians”


Ur allowed to.. may nagbabawal ba?? Ung reaction mo kasi mismo ang flawed… tinatawag mo ngang fake tapos ung mockery towards them pangangalandakan mo na “eto sinasbi ko christians are always mocked”… thats such hypocrisy

Asan na ung bible punishments?? U do know them right??

Why would we go to other topics about punishment? Eh ang OP is about blasphemous acts or art?

Kahit pa anong version of Christ pa yan. The point still remains luka misrepresents Christ. And still an act of mockery towards Christianity.

ahaha the quotes actually supports my argument that it was indeed a religion (way of worship) and it featured praising god in a different way (doctrine), kaya nga sabi ko sa iyo magtatayo din ako ng religion ko and i like to feature anti-christ doctrine, bawal ba?

No, it does not support your argument.

But everyone imagines Jesus differently. If you really read the Bible with open mind, including this warm and fuzzy Jesus of your imagination is also a misinterpretation. Try it.

Couldn't care less what everyone imagines of Jesus. There is only one version of Him written in the Scriptures. And is clear as day that It is not what that charlatan Luka represents.

How is that different? This Jews accusing Jesus is just as convinced that they are about truth just as much as you are.

It is just pure arrogance if you can think there is a night and day difference here.

Yup, there is night and day. I can clearly see it a million miles away

Truth and “fake”.

Of course, "not".

 

[jayendecastro]

Why would we go to other topics about punishment? Eh ang OP is about blasphemous acts or art?

Kahit pa anong version of Christ pa yan. The point still remains luka misrepresents Christ. And still an act of mockery towards Christianity.

U said na: its clear sa bible kung blasphemy or not.. im just asking kung ano din sabi sa bible ang punishment

 

[Kaplok Kaplok]

U said na: its clear sa bible kung blasphemy or not.. im just asking kung ano din sabi sa bible ang punishment

It is not really clear sa Bible kung ano ang blasphemy. It does hint that it is "disrespect"... But what constitute disrespect? Especially if we are dealing with a God na "iba ang kaisipan sa mga tao".. how do we know if this God might be enjoying it?

Well the only logical truth is, it is the devout christians who are offended when they claim blasphemy. They just pretend it is God.

That is a rough reality for someone who would claim "atheist don't believe God because they want to be their own god", Kasi it is clear who is elevating their preferences, and feelings as the will of a transcendent god.

 

[plhbg1]

No, it does not support your argument.

then you need to explain why it is not supporting or else my explanation on how it supports my argument will remain un-contested

 

[GildartsTale]

then you need to explain why it is not supporting or else my explanation on how it supports my argument will remain un-contested

I already explain it, you just don't get it.

U said na: its clear sa bible kung blasphemy or not.. im just asking kung ano din sabi sa bible ang punishment

I won't go down that rabbit hole. That is a topic for another day or so.