What's new

Anu na contribute ng religion

ikaw yung na-invalidate (buddhism) kaya ikaw yung magbigay/try again ng isa pang religion hehe
why should I cite you an example? I miss the part where thats my problem. Youre already wrong in distinguishing communism and socialism, and clearly you you had a poor grasp of what success is. Whats the point? where is my ROI in explaining to you these things.
 
why should I cite you an example? I miss the part where thats my problem. Youre already wrong in distinguishing communism and socialism, and clearly you you had a poor grasp of what success is. Whats the point? where is my ROI in explaining to you these things.
alright you cannot give a religion with no monies hehe
 
alright you cannot give a religion with no monies hehe
Buddhism? Judaism? Hinduism? Islam? Christians(not the catholics) There are Religions who were not meant for business. They simply acknowledge that there is a transcendental being above us. Paganism?
mga sina unang taong sumasamba sa araw at sa mga bituin atbp. May mga pera ba yun? it all comes down to motive and intention. Kung primarily motivated ang isang relihiyon dahil sa pera at hindi para sa Diyos ay hindi na relihiyon yun. Business na yun. Ok?
 
Buddhism? Judaism? Hinduism? Islam? Christians(not the catholics) There are Religions who were not meant for business. They simply acknowledge that there is a transcendental being above us. Paganism?
mga sina unang taong sumasamba sa araw at sa mga bituin atbp. May mga pera ba yun? it all comes down to motive and intention. Kung primarily motivated ang isang relihiyon dahil sa pera at hindi para sa Diyos ay hindi na relihiyon yun. Business na yun. Ok?
ah based on motivation pala ang judgement mo, not meant for business wala problema sa claims na iyan, i am only describing what's happening inside the religion regardless of what they claim not meant for business,

all religion given are organized and monies involve to run such organization and it will cost the members anything with monetary value whether voluntarily or responsibly

pagan appears to have no properly organized body, and members were still to offer anything with monetary value directly to the gods both voluntatily or responsibly

so religion still costs anything with monetary value among members
 
ah based on motivation pala ang judgement mo, not meant for business wala problema sa claims na iyan,
How about you, what do you think does religion meant for these people? Is it for business? To accumulate wealth? Or anything else?

i am only describing what's happening inside the religion regardless of what they claim not meant for business,
Just to be clear, Do you think that ALL RELIGIONS are just founded by people for the purpose of monetary gains, power and other wordly things?

all religion given are organized and monies involve to run such organization and it will cost the members anything with monetary value whether voluntarily or responsibly

pagan appears to have no properly organized body, and members were still to offer anything with monetary value directly to the gods both voluntatily or responsibly

So you are trying to say that if there is no properly organized body it is not a religion? (Like pagans?)
 
How about you, what do you think does religion meant for these people? Is it for business? To accumulate wealth? Or anything else?
some yes, but motivation does not really matter, wala ako paki sa motivation, sinasabi ko lang anu ang nangyayari
Just to be clear, Do you think that ALL RELIGIONS are just founded by people for the purpose of monetary gains, power and other wordly things?
some yes, pero i don't about gains by founding people, sinasabi ko lang kung anu nangyayari
So you are trying to say that if there is no properly organized body it is not a religion? (Like pagans?)
nope
 
Back
Top