Tutulongan moba kasi yun ang akma or hindi ka tutulong para sa paniniwala.

[xXxBlockedxXx]

well' di mo naman na explain kung bakit "hindi naging false logic" ang thread mo. nag adhominem kalang na wanna be logician ako with a question mark. At hindi komo mabait si Kristo eh inosente na sya, ni hindi mo nga na explain kung saan sya inosente kasi maraming bagay na pwede syang maging inosente and isang tao at hindi mo na explain yun sa reply mo. so still adhominem parin ang dating nung nabanggit mong mabait at nakakaawa sya kasi you are appealing to the emotion not no the logic. Another point, Christ was killed on the cross by the romans,he did not commited suicide like Judas did. it was not his doing of his own death. So yung adhominem mo na "if there is a suicidal person in front of you, you will just watch him commit suicide and die" doesn't count on the case of Christ, in normal circumstances oo syempre tutulungan mo yung taong suicidal, but Christ case is different, kaya false dilemma yung question mo.
sorry kung napagkamalan kitang atheist, and i agree that's dumb of me. but i still think that it is false dilemma.

HAHAHAHAHA
Appeal to emotion = Ad hominem hahahahaahah
well if you're asking for proofs about christchrist inn, I can site some bible verses (or u can jst check it on ur own) and dont tell me that bible is not a proof coz it can be if it's our bases or source
plus, this is a moral dilemma means affecting someone's emotion or feelings is one of its goals, I.e your accusation of Appeal to emotion fallacy is void.

Ad hominem again? alam mo ba ano meaning ng ad hominem? ad hominem, is a response to a person's argument by attacking the person's or the other party's character rather than the logic or content of the argument. Yan ang adhom, kung sinabi ko na, diko paniniwalaan yang sinabi mo kasi **** ka, or kasi dika naka pagraduate or kasi wala kang mama, or kasi pelay ka or kasi whatsoever character ang meron ka! ad hominem tawag dun. simpleng google lng naman sana, still not convinced? then prove me false, site which part of my previous replies posits ad hominem argument.

and yung suicide2 di yun related ky christ okay? hahhaa fyi that's what u call analogy, it is not directed to christ but to the situation. Hahayz, if ur next response would still be this stupid, I will ignore it.

 

[xXxBlockedxXx]

Tama ang sabi ng iba hindi ka nagbabasa ng bible. Kung ililigtas natin si Kristo sinisira natin ang plano ng diyos ama. Kung gusto man siyang iligtas may mga sundalong romanong naghihintay. Pero eto ang sagot ko hindi ko siya maililigtas dahil ano magagawa ko may mga bantay. Kagaya ng pagbaril kay jose rizal may magagawa ba tayo sa mga kastilang bantay. kailangan mong malaman nasusulat lahat ang mga future na mangyayari kay kristo.

hahayz di nagbabasa pero alam ko? ***** lng and taena wala bang rationality ang utak nyo. MORAL DILEMMA ITO! all you have to do is decide if you'll save him because of the power u have or not save him because you want to keep ur belief.

oh diba, ayan lng sasagot namn pla dami pa, sinasabi na walang basehan. Di raw nagbabasa lols. ***** din ng sagot mo pre, score 2/10. "May kapangyarihan ka para iligtas abg kung sino man sa isang galaw or salita" wala na magagawa dun ang mga sundalo na iniisip mo.

 

[xXxBlockedxXx]

Hindi nmin alam kung bakit or anu ang mga pinagdaanan mo sa buhay kaya ka ganyan mag isip, unang una gusto iligtas ng mga apostle c hesus, ngunit ayaw nya dahil dapat raw maganap ang nkatakda or ang prophesiya, ngaun ung nasa isip kung may kakayahan kang iligtas xa, nagiging animated ka or pabida epek, na isang bida na magliligtas , you better read the bible, hindi pa huli lahat pra sau, nabulag ka lang ng sarili mong lag iisip, pray

I don't need to re-read a unsubstantiated book. Okay based on ur poorly reasoned answer, score 2/10. Ang tanong ay para sayo tsaka moral dilemma to, kaya ang basehan dapat ng sagot mo ay ang sarili mong kalooban hindi yung sa mga apostles. But yeah we hve free will so bahala kana.

tsaka grabe panghuhusga mo ha, wala namang basehan, yan ba turo ng diyos? okips, proud sayo si God.

- may pinagdadaanan sa buhay? wala po ahahaha healthy, happy fam, may jowa and graduating.
- nabulag sa sariling pag iisip? ay wow ano basehan mo dyan pre.

 

[Doc Bk2k]

TAENA HAHAHAHAHA
Appeal to emotion = Ad hominem hahahahaahah
well if you're asking for proofs about christchrist inn, I can site some bible verses (or u can jst check it on ur own) and dont tell me that bible is not a proof coz it can be if it's our bases or source
plus, this is a moral dilemma means affecting someone's emotion or feelings is one of its goals, I.e your accusation of Appeal to emotion fallacy is void.

Ad hominem again? alam mo ba ano meaning ng ad hominem? ad hominem, is a response to a person's argument by attacking the person's or the other party's character rather than the logic or content of the argument. Yan ang adhom, kung sinabi ko na, diko paniniwalaan yang sinabi mo kasi **** ka, or kasi dika naka pagraduate or kasi wala kang mama, or kasi pelay ka or kasi whatsoever character ang meron ka! ad hominem tawag dun. simpleng google lng naman sana, still not convinced? then prove me false, site which part of my previous replies posits ad hominem argument.

and yung suicide2 di yun related ky christ okay? hahhaa fyi that's what u call analogy, it is not directed to christ but to the situation. Hahayz, if ur next response would still be this stupid, I will ignore it.

well that's good nag bigay ka ng definition ng Ad hominem, which i can also search from google, try mo din merriam to look for other meaning general na kasi masyado yung makukuha mo sa google, no wonder why your grammar are right this time, nagbigay ka din ng definition ng moral dilemma which therefore making my point valid kasi ayon narin sa definition mo mismo You are trying to affect someone's emotion or feeling which is the goal, sa post mo na and I quote "Ganito yung sitwasyon, balik tayo sa panahon kung saan naka pako na si Hesus, si Hesus na NAPAKA bait, NAPAKA matulungin at walang ibang ginawa kundi ang tumulong at magpagaling, ay nakapako sa Krus! isang pwesto na hindi nararapat sa kanya, nakakaawa sya diba? maawa ka." unquote. You are already injecting the appeal to the emotion. and this not the fallacy na makukuha mo from google. i dont know the purpose of your thread but for me if you are really what you said, that you are preaching the goodness of God or Christ then you should not ask this type of question where there is no right wrong answer, parang episode ng hunterxhunter nung tinanong sina gon kung sinong ililigtas nya kung yung kasintan nya or yung nanay nya na parehong nalulunod at isa lang ang pwede nyang sagipin such paradox should be left for agnost and atheos. ou nga pala sabi mo kapag nonsense para sayo rung reply ko e you'll just ignore it ok. res ipsa loquitur. p.s. paki google
labyu

 

[lockemload]

ang ganda ng tanong mo...walang tatamang sagot.... para ka lang nagtanong ng kung alin ang nauna itlog o manok....

 

[Esper01]

I don't need to re-read a unsubstantiated book. Okay based on ur poorly reasoned answer, score 2/10. Ang tanong ay para sayo tsaka moral dilemma to, kaya ang basehan dapat ng sagot mo ay ang sarili mong kalooban hindi yung sa mga apostles. But yeah we hve free will so bahala kana.

tsaka grabe panghuhusga mo ha, wala namang basehan, yan ba turo ng diyos? okips, proud sayo si God.

- may pinagdadaanan sa buhay? wala po ahahaha healthy, happy fam, may jowa and graduating.
- nabulag sa sariling pag iisip? ay wow ano basehan mo dyan pre.

alam mo pre wala kang paliwanag na tatanggapin, oi graduating and may jowa at happy fam, ipagpasalamat mo yan sa Diyos , wag kang magmatalino dito , magtatanong ka at magbibigay kami ng sarili nming paliwanag tapos ipamumumka mo sa kada taong nagcomment na superior utak mo, debate hanap mo atheist, kung talagang matapang ka maghanap ka makakausap in real harap harapan, hindi ung nagkukubli ka sa chatrooms,

 

[homer_simpson]

So the future is already known and determined?

Hindi nmin alam kung bakit or anu ang mga pinagdaanan mo sa buhay kaya ka ganyan mag isip, unang una gusto iligtas ng mga apostle c hesus, ngunit ayaw nya dahil dapat raw maganap ang nkatakda or ang prophesiya, ngaun ung nasa isip kung may kakayahan kang iligtas xa, nagiging animated ka or pabida epek, na isang bida na magliligtas , you better read the bible, hindi pa huli lahat pra sau, nabulag ka lang ng sarili mong lag iisip, pray

Psst! I'm going to disclose this. That event was scripted. Di pa ba clue sa inyo at gaya ng sinasabi nyo na ang mga pangyayari ay nakasulat at dapat matupad. In short, alam na ng bos god mo ang conclusion habang ang mga miron ay laway na laway sa susunod na tagpo. Therefore, alam ni bos hesus na si pedro ay tatayo at titigpasin ng tabak ang tenga ng isang sundalo in act of defending him. alam nya na ang susunod na aksyon nya ay paghimulan ang tenga ng sundalo at pangaralan si pedro na "ang nabubuhay sa tabak, ay sa tabak din namamatay".

Sa matuling sabi, alam na kung sino sino ang "maliligtas". Ang siste, tayong mga tao na nanalig at nagdadasal ay umaasa na isa sa maliligtas. However, none of us know that most of the aspirants are already doomed. That sounds fishy to me. Anu kaya't mag-eksamin sa eskwelahan tapos alam na ng titser mo ang marka mo prior to taking the test. Does it sounds fair to you?

 

[xXxBlockedxXx]

alam mo pre wala kang paliwanag na tatanggapin, oi graduating and may jowa at happy fam, ipagpasalamat mo yan sa Diyos , wag kang magmatalino dito , magtatanong ka at magbibigay kami ng sarili nming paliwanag tapos ipamumumka mo sa kada taong nagcomment na superior utak mo, debate hanap mo atheist, kung talagang matapang ka maghanap ka makakausap in real harap harapan, hindi ung nagkukubli ka sa chatrooms,

sino ka para utusan ako? and tang-a kaba? sino may sabi na hindi pwede makipag debate sa social media? wew, taga bukid lng kasi outdated na pre. Fyi lng, kahit saan pwede mkakipag debate bsta ma bigay mo ang rebuttals mo properly. Oral or written, in person, through social media or through texting2/calling2.
and yes, nakikipag debate ako in person, be it politics, religion or any debatable topics. lols

and hindi ako dito pra makipag debate (maliban nlng dun sa nakipag engage ng debate) andito ako pra magtanong and pra malaman ang sagot nyo, if may reponse ako sa inyo, it's either nagbigay ako ng score or kinorrect ko ang delivery nyo sa answer, tulad ng pgcorrect ko sayo, sabi ko dapat ang answer mo nka depende sa kalooban mo kasi moral dilemma to.

 

[xXxBlockedxXx]

ang ganda ng tanong mo...walang tatamang sagot.... para ka lang nagtanong ng kung alin ang nauna itlog o manok....

kaya nga yan moral dilemma eh, and may sagot yan. Di naman kelangan tama ang sagot dito.

para naman dyan sa itlog at manok na tanong mo. Itlog ang nauna kasi ang mga Dinosaurs ay nangingitlog, (wala pang manok sa panahong ito)

 

[x_SNUFF_x]

I've got a question about " kian de los Santos case"
Would have save him before, if one family member of him was there, to stop the cop on shooting the kid. Or also took the bullet of their life?

 

[sanskuro]

hahayz di nagbabasa pero alam ko? ***** lng and taena wala bang rationality ang utak nyo. MORAL DILEMMA ITO! all you have to do is decide if you'll save him because of the power u have or not save him because you want to keep ur belief.

oh diba, ayan lng sasagot namn pla dami pa, sinasabi na walang basehan. Di raw nagbabasa lols. ***** din ng sagot mo pre, score 2/10. "May kapangyarihan ka para iligtas abg kung sino man sa isang galaw or salita" wala na magagawa dun ang mga sundalo na iniisip mo.

Oh really. So your questuon is fictional malayo sa reality at sa imagination lang pwede mangyari. Well i change my answer gagawin kong malafinal fantasy ang pagsugod sa mga bantay na sundalo.

 

[noelled44]

This scenario is subjective. With all due respect,if it conflicts your morals, I suggest that you troll silently.

I don't have an answer, feel free to throw stones.

 

[xXxBlockedxXx]

This scenario is subjective. With all due respect,if it conflicts your morals, I suggest that you troll silently.

I don't have an answer, feel free to throw stones.

ofcrs it is sucjective cz it's abt u and ur morality. And, if u didn't have any answer u should've jst ignored this rather than commenting/posting something that doesn't contribute anything.

 

[xXxBlockedxXx]

Oh really. So your questuon is fictional malayo sa reality at sa imagination lang pwede mangyari. Well i change my answer gagawin kong malafinal fantasy ang pagsugod sa mga bantay na sundalo.

awtsu, where were u when God blessed humanity the capacity to think and understand. Okay ~~~

 

[sanskuro]

awtsu, where were u when God blessed humanity the capacity to think and understand. Okay ~~~

Where me nandito lang ako

 

[MynamesAlvin]

Hindi po,kung ang Diyos Ama na may kapangyarihan na gawin ang sinasabi po Ninyo na pagtulong kay Jesus ay hindi nya ginawa, bakit ko po gagawin syang tulungan esp. kung may awareness ka kung bakit nya ito kailangang pagdaanan.

 

[xXxBlockedxXx]

Hindi po,kung ang Diyos Ama na may kapangyarihan na gawin ang sinasabi po Ninyo na pagtulong kay Jesus ay hindi nya ginawa, bakit ko po gagawin syang tulungan esp. kung may awareness ka kung bakit nya ito kailangang pagdaanan.

okay2 as the questioner ur score is 6/10.

 

[Mjlove]

For me even if you answer it at any side you'll maybe wrong or right

Because you will going to have a chance to save someone who was innocent but if you did so you'll going to failed God's will to save peoples (unknown) sin

anyway how I look at this tread is more like a crowd mind game trick but don't mind this is just an opinion of mine

 

[D3LF1N]

yehey

 

[x_SNUFF_x]

Father why have you forsaken me.
Says the son to his father.

But the father keep in silent.

So are we superior than the father or the son
The truth

That time they all want to help the Christ too
But with the forces of Romans.they Can't like war on drugs