Trivia Is Wikipedia a reliable source? An answer coming from Wikipedia itself.

[Deleted member 1523148]

So why bother?
Even the site itself said that "it is not a reliable source".

Kaya pag may gustong makipagdialogo sayo pero PURE wikipedia lang sites na alam nya eh, Wag na pag-aksayahan ng oras yan...
TROLL lang yan..
Bataan ng mga haters..

Dun tayo makipag-usap sa may weight.

 

[Hwrd]

No, pag nag tthesis ka hindi ka sa wikipedia kumuha ng information hahshshhs tatapon lang ng panel yan.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

No, pag nag tthesis ka hindi ka sa wikipedia kumuha ng information hahshshhs tatapon lang ng panel yan.

totoo..
ewan ko ba bat di alam ng mga tao yan dito..
ipipilit pa nilang "proof" yun..
hahah..

 

[jungard]

i think wikipedia is still reliable in terms of basic knowledge. lahat ng information naman doon is based or may reference sa on online articles. marami naman pong masesearch sa internet aside sa wikipedia, you just need to do your effort

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

i think wikipedia is still reliable in terms of basic knowledge. lahat ng information naman doon is based or may reference sa on online articles. marami naman pong masesearch sa internet aside sa wikipedia, you just need to do your effort

Ung siguro ung comedy part dun, basic na nga lang mali-mali pa..

 

[jungard]

Ung siguro ung comedy part dun, basic na nga lang mali-mali pa..

syempre wikipedia base it on references. sometimes the reference is not reliable too. nakakatawa pero this is one method to understand something diba?

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

syempre wikipedia base it on references. sometimes the reference is not reliable too. nakakatawa pero this is one method to understand something diba?

Madaming di inaaccept ang wikipiedia as a good source kasi kahit bata(at isip bata) pwedeng baguhin ung nkasulat doon..
Mas okay padin talaga ang libro,pdf or article ng mga may degree na backed up ng study nila...
Pero Wiki?? Parang naniwala kalang sa tsismis..

 

[jungard]

Madaming di inaaccept ang wikipiedia as a good source kasi kahit bata(at isip bata) pwedeng baguhin ung nkasulat doon..
Mas okay padin talaga ang libro,pdf or article ng mga may degree na backed up ng study nila...
Pero Wiki?? Parang naniwala kalang sa tsismis..

backed up ng study? yes pwede maging basis. what if, you have your thesis (with backed up study) na publish as online article and then use as a reference sa wikipedia. so tsismis din yun?

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

backed up ng study? yes pwede maging basis. what if, you have your thesis (with backed up study) na publish as online article and then use as a reference sa wikipedia. so tsismis din yun?

well that is called plagiarism..
Bat nmn ako papayag na ipost sa wikipedia ung gawa ko na ALAM kong pwedeng babuyin lng ng kung sino?
And they will NEVER have any of my work in their site..

Eto ung reason kaya walang sumusugal sa Wikipedia..

 

[fabbriche]

Mas reliable ang Wikipedia kesa religion. May references at sources ang mga articles sa Wikipedia. Hindi mo un basta basta maeedit. Marerevert ung edit mo kung walang valid source at mababan IP mo kung nageedit ka ng false info.

 

[fabbriche]

Madaming di inaaccept ang wikipiedia as a good source kasi kahit bata(at isip bata) pwedeng baguhin ung nkasulat doon..
Mas okay padin talaga ang libro,pdf or article ng mga may degree na backed up ng study nila...
Pero Wiki?? Parang naniwala kalang sa tsismis..

Try mong iedit ung Wikipedia article na "Intelligent Design" at ilagay mo dung 100% ng mga scientists naniniwala sa Intelligent Design at scientific un. Edit mo rin ng wiki article tungkol sa "Evolution" at ilagay mong hoax un. Cge nga tingnan ko kung magagawa mo.

 

[fabbriche]

95% reliable ang Wikipedia lalo na sa mga scientific at historical subjects. Hindi xa ganun ka-reliable pagdating sa political topics.

 

[jungard]

95% reliable ang Wikipedia lalo na sa mga scientific at historical subjects. Hindi xa ganun ka-reliable pagdating sa political topics.

kahit ayaw naten sa wikipedia..there is a time na ginamit din natin cla to understand something..

 

[JackFrost10]

wikipedia has a citation section, reference links and reference books with notes etc., nothing is reliable online, thats why citation is added to refer to the original source.

wikipedia has thousands of article moderated by a few people, thats why they say they are not reliable to the extent that they cannot fact check every article and changes in the site.

also if you read the last part of the pic you provided, I wouldn't have to explain.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

95% reliable ang Wikipedia lalo na sa mga scientific at historical subjects. Hindi xa ganun ka-reliable pagdating sa political topics.

eto nnmn ung Wikipedia King...

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

Mas reliable ang Wikipedia kesa religion. May references at sources ang mga articles sa Wikipedia. Hindi mo un basta basta maeedit. Marerevert ung edit mo kung walang valid source at mababan IP mo kung nageedit ka ng false info.

Parang ang hirap nmn baguhin ang IP..
hahahahaha...

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

wikipedia has a citation section, reference links and reference books with notes etc., nothing is reliable online, thats why citation is added to refer to the original source.

wikipedia has thousands of article moderated by a few people, thats why they say they are not reliable to the extent that they cannot fact check every article and changes in the site.

also if you read the last part of the pic you provided, I wouldn't have to explain.

Which can still be change... then can be edited again.. then can be corrected again... then can be ch..................

Nakakapagod.,,

Enjoy Wikipedia..

 

[fabbriche]

eto nnmn ung Wikipedia King...

Eto na nmn ang science-denier...

 

[fabbriche]

Which can still be change... then can be edited again.. then can be corrected again... then can be ch..................

Nakakapagod.,,

Enjoy Wikipedia..

Hindi mo mapapansin ung edit na may false info dahil sobrang bilis marevert ng edited page sa previous version.

 

[Deleted member 1523148]

Eto na nmn ang science-denier...

ui kuya, FYI lang ah.. Alagad ako ng Science.. baka ipabalandra ko sayo course ko.