Trivia DO YOU BELIEVE GUYS IF THERES NO RELIGION NO CRIME

[jB 127_-]

sa palagay nyo at opinyon nyo curious lang ako

meron paring crimen

 

[HaNz0]

be respectful paps wag mo samahan ng mura, i hate religious leaders pero hindi ko sila minumura kung nanunuod ka ng debate ng mga atheists at religious leaders sa yôutubê makikita kung gano ang respect nila sa bawat isa exept kay Dan Barker na mahilig mag segway ng topic to denounce religion haha

sorry paps.. naddala lang ako e.

 

[HaNz0]

Ad Hominem yata yun tawag dun,.. correct me if i'm wrong.

un.. opo un nga po

 

[matakeru21]

hinde bible para maging atheist..reading bible made you become panatic to GOD ..research make you an atheist

I do some research amd actually join group about atheist.. still i"m no atheist.. but I consider myself as an agnostic theist..

 

[HaNz0]

Sa simula pa lang nilabas ko na sinuman sa mga taong nabanggit mo or sinuman mga yan. Hindi ko nga pinasok bible kasi yan basehan nila. Ang mababaw na stand ay ang sa'yo. Sinasabi mo kasi existence mo ay hindi ginawa ng someone up there. Edi by accident lang 2nd choice dun diba? Either created by someone or by accident lang. Kung naniniwala ka na nabuo DNA mo by accident lang then so be it. Just like a computer hindi mabuo OS n'yan ng walang nag create sa kanya.

hahaha... di ka pumili sa pinapili ko aa.. btw, i didn't letterally said that there isn't someone who created! so be it kasi parang ganun narin e.. ikaw naman kasi sinasabi mo na agad that there is someone! do you have any evidences? your just concluding! wow fantastic baby! so walang pinagka iba yan sa sa pinagsasabi ng mga nasa religious sector, na nagsasabi agad ng ganito ganyan, without solid evidence.

 

[fleijadamocles]

hahaha... di ka pumili sa pinapili ko aa.. btw, i didn't letterally said that there isn't someone who created! so be it kasi parang ganun narin e.. ikaw naman kasi sinasabi mo na agad that there is someone! do you have any evidences? your just concluding! wow fantastic baby! so walang pinagka iba yan sa sa pinagsasabi ng mga nasa religious sector, na nagsasabi agad ng ganito ganyan, without solid evidence.

Bakit ako pipili? Hindi nga ako naniniwala sa bible, sa mga yan pa kaya? Pipili pa ng tao na binabase ang lahat sa bible? Now you're making me redundant. E diba hindi ka naniniwala na may God, na may someone who created? Anong side ka ba talaga? Naniniwala na may someone or wala? Haha. Kasi kung naniniwala ka na walang someone edi you're also concluding! How can you provide an evidence of existence of someone who is not bound or limited by anyone or anything? Sige provide ka din evidence na walang creator. Kasi kung hindi ka makakapagprovide ng evidence edi wala ka din pinagkaiba sa sinasabi mo na pinagsasabi ng mga religious sector na nagsasabi ng gento ganyan without solid evidence.

 

[bunihinsibuni08]

dapat may relehiyon at ang relehiyon nayun ay ang Members Church of God international

 

[sixTnine]

dapat may relehiyon at ang relehiyon nayun ay ang Members Church of God internationa

huh

 

[GODzDOG]

Walang

Kaya N'ya gawin yun. Ikaw lang may sabi na mabuti lang para sa'yo ang pwede nyang gawin. Kaya nga He's someone not bound or limited by anyone or anything.

Hindi sinungaling Dios dahil kalaban nya ang hari ng kasinungalingan ang opinion mo masyadong pointless. Kung gusto mo talaga patunayan mag latag ka ng talata sa Biblia na nag sinungaling ang Dios.

 

[fleijadamocles]

Walang
Hindi sinungaling Dios dahil kalaban nya ang hari ng kasinungalingan ang opinion mo masyadong pointless. Kung gusto mo talaga patunayan mag latag ka ng talata sa Biblia na nag sinungaling ang Dios.

Magkaiba kasi tayo ng definition ng God kaya hindi talaga magtatama yan. Yung God mo may limitation like hindi siya pwede magsinungaling kasi sa standard mo masama yun. Yan ang pointless kasi binibigyan mo limitation si God depende sa standard mo ng masama at mabuti. My God is someone who is not bounded or limited by anyone or anything while your God was defined by a book written by a mere human. Time!

 

[HaNz0]

Bakit ako pipili? Hindi nga ako naniniwala sa bible, sa mga yan pa kaya? Pipili pa ng tao na binabase ang lahat sa bible? Now you're making me redundant. E diba hindi ka naniniwala na may God, na may someone who created? Anong side ka ba talaga? Naniniwala na may someone or wala? Haha. Kasi kung naniniwala ka na walang someone edi you're also concluding! How can you provide an evidence of existence of someone who is not bound or limited by anyone or anything? Sige provide ka din evidence na walang creator. Kasi kung hindi ka makakapagprovide ng evidence edi wala ka din pinagkaiba sa sinasabi mo na pinagsasabi ng mga religious sector na nagsasabi ng gento ganyan without solid evidence.

im in the side of atheists. yes i have an evidence that god is not true, this proof is not that strong but enough to demolish your conclusion. the one and only proof of existence of god is the bible. theres a lot of loop holes in there, specially the old bible that is why it keeps revising by the church. from the old bible, theres a rule there of the god that the girls must not possess any task to goverment or work outside. that was a rule long time a go, how come it was written on the holy bible? if it was really the will of god. See, it means that the person who wrote the bible, didn't really wrote the will of god but the will of who controling that religious sector. second, in the bible it was written how he made the world, animals, plants and person.. question! . who wrote to the bible during his creation?

 

[fleijadamocles]

im in the side of atheists. yes i have an evidence that god is not true, this proof is not that strong but enough to demolish your conclusion. the one and only proof of existence of god is the bible. theres a lot of loop holes in there, specially the old bible that is why it keeps revising by the church. from the old bible, theres a rule there of the god that the girls must not possess any task to goverment or work outside. that was a rule long time a go, how come it was written on the holy bible? if it was really the will of god. See, it means that the person who wrote the bible, didn't really wrote the will of god but the will of who controling that religious sector. second, in the bible it was written how he made the world, animals, plants and person.. question! . who wrote to the bible during his creation?

Iba conclusion ni bible. Yang proof mo na yan hindi n'yan ma demolish conclusion ko kasi nakabase ka din sa bible, a book written by a mere human. My God is someone who is not bounded or limited by anyone or anything. You're making me redundant again for the second time. Haha. It simply means that His existence don't have any evidence kasi nga tao lang ako at God S'ya. Katulad ng sabi ko nung una, magkaiba tayo ng definition ng God. Yung sinasabi mong God ay someone na defined and limited by a book na tinawag mong bible. Mahirap yan, nakabase opinion mo sa isang bagay na tao lang din naman ang may gawa. E diba yan din ginagamit ng mga tao na nabanggit mo kanina na pinapapili mo ako? Edi parang ganun ka din pala, difference is you're on the other side of the coin.

 

[vinsoii2016]

Sa opinion ko lng po ang krimen ay wla pong koneksyon sa relihiyon c: ang relihiyon parang isa

 

[rh4mz]

bilib lang ako talaga sa mga leaders ng mga relihiyon ..pagkayayaman..samantalang ang members nanatiling mahirap..at tagasunod..

Ginagawa kasing negosyo ang religion, kaya dumarami ang religion tao nga naman mautak haha. pag di sila contented sa religion nila at gusto nila magkapera ito ay isa sa cause kung bat gumagawa sila iba religion kung saan sila ang pipili ng gusto nilang paniwalaan or sila din gagawa ng rules. Dami nagsulputan na ibang religion pero halos pare pareho lang paininiwala iniba lang ng kunti, may iba lakas makarecruit haha.

 

[HaNz0]

Iba conclusion ni bible. Yang proof mo na yan hindi n'yan ma demolish conclusion ko kasi nakabase ka din sa bible, a book written by a mere human. My God is someone who is not bounded or limited by anyone or anything. You're making me redundant again for the second time. Haha. It simply means that His existence don't have any evidence kasi nga tao lang ako at God S'ya. Katulad ng sabi ko nung una, magkaiba tayo ng definition ng God. Yung sinasabi mong God ay someone na defined and limited by a book na tinawag mong bible. Mahirap yan, nakabase opinion mo sa isang bagay na tao lang din naman ang may gawa. E diba yan din ginagamit ng mga tao na nabanggit mo kanina na pinapapili mo ako? Edi parang ganun ka din pala, difference is you're on the other side of the coin.

yeah! im on the other side of the coin, and
you, your awesome! your on the other coin! , through your conclusion your making your own god. oh common, dont tell you'll be making your own religion someday .. same though, theres no defference to the newly found relegion as of right now. make a better book ok. (whisper) "the one that has no hole".

by the way, since then you deny also that the bible is not a reliable source of existence of god, because your making your on god .. i accepted that my argument is useless unto you. but still you are lacking evidence to prove it. hindi porket hindi mo na kayang patunayan, or maabot ng ating kaisipan, sasabihin mo na agad, 'ai sya na nga'. better to study first, if there is talaga..

 

[Deleted member 1207647]

pag walang relihiyon mas maraming krimen sa palagay ko. mas iba pa rin ang may Relihiyon may pinaniniwalaang dyos, may takot silang gumawa ng masama, yong mga taong gumagawa ng krimen posibleng sila ay rebilde sa kanilang mga sarili, maaring may bisyo, gumagamit ng droga. hanggang tumatagal pasama na ng pasama ang ating kapwa.

I am a religous person pero I disagree dahil pwede natin ijustify lahat ng kasalanan as God's will lol

 

[fleijadamocles]

yeah! im on the other side of the coin, and
you, your awesome! your on the other coin! , through your conclusion your making your own god. oh common, dont tell you'll be making your own religion someday .. same though, theres no defference to the newly found relegion as of right now. make a better book ok. (whisper) "the one that has no hole".

by the way, since then you deny also that the bible is not a reliable source of existence of god, because your making your on god .. i accepted that my argument is useless unto you. but still you are lacking evidence to prove it. hindi porket hindi mo na kayang patunayan, or maabot ng ating kaisipan, sasabihin mo na agad, 'ai sya na nga'. better to study first, if there is talaga..

Religion was just something used to divide human numbers kaya hindi ko gagawin mag start nyan. Just like I've told you before, my God can't be defined and limited by just a mere book so if it's evidence of His existence you're looking for then there's none because no one can provide one. Kung loopholes hanap mo ay makakakita ka talaga sa bible n'yan kasi gawa lang ng tao yan.

 

[perfectmonster13]

Even without religion, humans have the capability of knowing what is good and bad through the natural law... The natural law doesn't need religion to be understood.. therefore, even without religion, doing bad things such as murder will still be a crime.

 

[GODzDOG]

Magkaiba kasi tayo ng definition ng God kaya hindi talaga magtatama yan. Yung God mo may limitation like hindi siya pwede magsinungaling kasi sa standard mo masama yun. Yan ang pointless kasi binibigyan mo limitation si God depende sa standard mo ng masama at mabuti. My God is someone who is not bounded or limited by anyone or anything while your God was defined by a book written by a mere human. Time!

Ang the One and Almighty God na tinatawag ay PERFECTO the alpha and the omega ang pasimuno at ang magtatapos, wala syang bahid ng dumis o kasalanan yung sinasabi mong pwde mag sinungaling sila ang tinatawag na gods or goddesses. Kahit isa isahin mo pa ang talata sa Biblia never nag sinungaling si Cristo dahil kung naka gawa sya ng kasalanan hindi nya maliligtas tayo. Para kang si satanas na nag tukso kay Cristo na kung Dios daw sya tumalon sya sa bundok at iligtas ang kanyang sarili si satanas din ang nag udyok sa tao na ipapako si Cristo. Nag pakababa ang Dios dahil sa pagmamahal nya sa atin pero hindi ibig sabihin na mahina sya. Yan ang tinatawag na unconditional love, Mas higit pa sa pagmamahal ng magulang mo sayo. Galit ang Dios sa makasalanan kaya nya nga sinunog ang Sodom at Gomora. Tapos sabihin mo pa na hindi kaya ng Dios mag sinungaling yan talaga ang pagiisip ni Satanas noong tinutukso nya si Cristo sa deserto.

 

[fleijadamocles]

Ang God na tinatawag ay PERFECT walang bahid ng dumis o kasalanan yung sinasabi mong pwde mag sinungaling sila ang tinatawag na gods or goddesses. Ang One and Almighty God. Kahit isa isahin mo pa ang talata sa Biblia never nag sinungaling si Cristo dahil naka gawa sya ng kasalanan hindi nya maliligtas tayo. Para kang si satanas na nag tukso kay Cristo na kung Dios daw sya tumalon sya sa bukid at iligtas ang kanyang sarili. Nag pakababa ang Dios dahil sa pagmamahal nya sa atin pero hindi ibig sabihin na mahina sya. Yan ang tinatawag na unconditional love. Tulad ng pagmamahal magulang mo sayo. Galit ang Dios sa makasalanan kaya nya nga sinunog ang Sodom at Gomora. Tapos sabihin mo pa na hindi kaya ng Dios mag sinungaling yan talaga ang pagiisip ni Satanas noong tinutukso nya si Cristo sa deserto.

Ang standard ng mabuti at masama ay sa'yo lang yun. Wag mo ibigay kay God na walang limitasyon. Hindi ikaw ang magdictate na ganto dapat si God na dapat mabuti lang ginagawa n'ya kasi nga God S'ya. Dun pa lang sa thinking na yun sala na. Sino ba ang God, ikaw or S'ya ba talaga? Bakit mo s'ya binibigyan ng standard? Sinasabi mo ba na bawal pumatay si God kasi ang pagkakaalam mo kay God ay mabuti s'ya? Ako ba talaga may pag iisip na satanas or ikaw? Ang sakin kasi God is someone who is not bounded or limited by anyone or anything. Mabuti man or masama. E ikaw mabuti lang para sa'yo kaya nyang gawin, edi parang mas mataas ka pa sa kanya para sabihin yun. Just like other religious group gumagamit ka ng book written by a mere human.