Actually chinicheck ko po lahat ng sources ko nang mabuti
Based sa post niyo po so far, ang main sources niyo mg info ay 2 na FB groups
Well established na po na source of disinformation ang mga SocMed, di ko na siguro kailangan i explain
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Pwede po bang paki specify aling source ang mali, para ma evaluate ko din, baka nga naman mali talaga
Alin ang mali, at bakit po kaya mali?
Again po, any proof na "created" ang AIDS?
Ang mas probable origin po ay SIV to HIV-2 to HIV-1 (chimps to humans)
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Tapos sa timeline po,
detected siya ng 1980s, yun ang tama
Ang
oldest verified po na HIV-1 ay galing sa isang
1959 blood sample
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
So ginawa po kaya ni Fauci yung AIDS nung 1st year college siya? (1959 banda)
Ang most probable at accepted po na origin ay 1920s pa sa D.R. Congo, galing po sa avert.org ang info
Reliable po ang avert.org na source
Why should I trust Avert.org?
- We are accredited by the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.. We have the ‘PIF TICK’ quality mark, which means that our editorial processes have been reviewed by an independent body to make sure that the health information we produce is of the highest quality, clear and accurate.
- We are verified and green rated by You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now., an internet trust tool that provides detailed trust ratings for 6,000+ news websites that account for 95% of online engagement with news.
- All our information is reviewed by subject matter experts. Our expert peer reviewers check to ensure all information is accurate and up-to-date.
- We only use the highest-quality data and evidence sources which are vetted by robust internal processes. We provide references for all of our content.
- We are led by research. We conduct weekly reviews of all the new research and developments that happen in HIV and sexual health. This means that our information is always up-to-date with the latest information.
- We regularly review and update our content. We have rigorous internal systems to ensure that our content is regularly reviewed and updated with the latest evidence from HIV and sexual health. We tell you when our pages were last reviewed and when they are next due to be updated.
- We have over 30 years’ experience in producing the highest quality information on HIV and sexual health, giving our users the knowledge, skills and confidence to take control of their sexual health. Our staff have decades of international experience across the HIV and sexual health sectors.
- We are signatories of the Patient Information Forum’s You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now., which aspires to make it easier for people to navigate, understand, and use information and services to take care of their health. We have also endorsed the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now., which are guidelines designed to help integrate best practices into digital programmes.
Again, any source or proof for these statements? Or opinions po ba ito or conjecture (haka-haka)?
Eto po yung
Science (mag) paper kung saan naka state yung 1920s
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Eto po ang sinabi ko, take note po na "
sa mga bata", hindi "ang mga bata"
"Pero mas makaka spread po kasi sa mga bata, matanda, at may ibang sakit ang unvaccinated."
Siguro para mas clear, eto po rephrase, pero same meaning pa din
Ang mga unvaccinated, mas makaka
spread po kasi sa mga bata, matanda, at may ibang sakit
Speaking of credibility, mga reliable sources naman po lahat ng sources ko
I compare niyo po ito pag ang source ay 2 Facebook groups na may false claims at incorrect arguments
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Pati po yung mismong founder, Ortho, hindi Infectious Diseases ang specialty
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Nag po promote pa ng Ivermectin, which is a true red flag
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
"Although some early clinical studies suggested the potential efficacy of ivermectin in the treatment and prevention of COVID-19, these studies had methodologic weaknesses."
To be continued po ang haba e
Ang isa daw possible factor dito ay yung increased testing noong January, tsaka yung pagpasok ng Omicron
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
"Government statistics show that in the last nine days, per 100,000 people unvaccinated there were on average 1.65 deaths per day, versus a rate of 0.33 for the vaccinated population. Seriously ill hospital cases were seen at an average rate of 20.03 per day for the unvaccinated compared to 3.7 per day among the vaccinated"
Dito po sa tracker tapos na sa Phase 3 ang
Pfizer, Moderna, Sputnik V, AstraZ, Janssen, Sinovac
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Aling vaccine po ba yung clinical trial or experiment?
Again, hindi po credible itong mga doctors na ito. Kung mabanggit po sana niyo names nila, for sure may nag di disagree or nag di discredit sa kanila.
Kung ang mainstream media na ibig sabihin niyo ay yung nag che check kung credible ang sources ko, then, thanks, sa tingin ko compliment ito. Gusto ko, kaya kong mag self correct, mag fact check ng mga sinasabi ko, at umamin pag may mali at i adjust sa mas bago o mas tama.
Wala pong nag e exist na "settled science", kasi ang science laging pwedeng ma disprove.
Pag may bagong concept or explanation, at
yun ang tama, at pwedeng i test experimentally, itatapon yung lumang concept at papalitan ng bago.
Mas accurate at safe pong sabihin na
"the latest science says..."
Last year pa po, may galit po sya kasi na "write out of history" po siya, pero hindi po siya ang inventor, sya na mismo nagsabi
UPDATE: Malone reached out to Logically, stating that he did not invent the mRNA vaccines, but instead the "vaccine technology platform." He also presented us with copies of nine patents – none of which showed that he invented the mRNA vaccines.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Katunayan, malungkot ang story nito, kasi hindi siya inventor, pero fundamental yung nagawa niya, kaso mukhang abrasive po siya at hindi madaling maka trabaho. Sayang, baka makasama pa sana siya sa future Nobel.
"It is Dr. Katalin Karikó and her collaborator Dr. Drew Weissman who are more commonly credited with laying the groundwork for mRNA vaccines."
Unfortunately, kilala na siya, isa po siya sa mga nag le-lead sa pag spread ng disinformation
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Kung meron po, kailangan i report sa DOH
Or baka naman anecdotal na naman yan or kwento
Or baka naman po sourced ito sa VAERS, na kung saan kahit sino pwede mag report
Pero ang reports po ay ivi-verify muna ng CDC dapat
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post.
Log in or register now.
Alin po doon yung Wikipedia link? Ni review ko po wala naman po kahit isang Wikipedia
Proof? Any documents? Or anecdotal na naman ba ito, kwento? Haka-haka?
Ang SocMed po again ang worst possible source of information dahil sa false claims at incorrect arguments
Yun pong mga dangers are well documented at stated, yung possible side effects, di naman tinatago
Nasa taas po yung sagot ko, sana may proof po kayo na ρáíd
At naka list po sa taas yung Phase 3 trials na tapos na
Isa pa, would you suggest any media na hindi ρáíd, at reliable ang info?
Kasi mag be benefit tayo lahat sa media na yan as a good source of credible info
Nasa news naman po yung truckers, kaya nga nabalitaan ko din, headline pa nga sila lagi e
Sinong news network po ba specifically ang hindi nagbalita nung truckers?
Sige po lods, abangan natin, although don't hold your breath
Sana naman hindi tumaas
Yan po talaga ang target ng vaccine, kumbaga pino "provoke" niya ang immune system para gumawa ng atibodies. MRNA nga yung Pfizer 'n' Moderna, tama.
Or ang ibig niyo ba sabihin ay na we-weaken yung immune system?
Again names or a link to the list of names po sana
Para ma evalute po natin at baka naman may credible dyan