na close tuloy yung kabilang thread dahil sa kabugukan mo haha
so lets continue on this wag mo lang sasamahan ng kabaliwan at ng matino ang talakayan
alam mo yan dinadal mo mga recent alternative theories ay kaylan lang nabuo yan egoy nag babase ka sa concensus ng mga scientist pero hindi mo ma accept na ang universe ay may beginning, nakikichismis ka lang kasi at hindi mo alam at nauunawa ang pinagsasabi - why u cant accept that big is the most plausible explaination of the origin of the universe eh mga kapwa atheist nagsasabi iyan ay may beginning?
i take my time kanina para silipin un isa sa mga sources ng link mo
kung ganyan nman labanan stupid style ng debate na style mo mas madali sakin yan so pag bibigyan kita sa agos mo
ang isang link ng pinagkuhanan mo ay may title na
Big Bang, Deflated? Universe May Have Had No Beginning
sabi mo ay bumabase ka sa scientific concencus egoy sa title pa lang nito ay palpak na at walang scientific fact "may had a begginning maaring may beginning? hahaha asan un exact science dyan
talagang oudated na ang utak at basehan mo
one of the proponent of this 20th century idea is according na din sa article ng link mo ay si Saurya Das a theoretical physicist, and i take my free time how credible this physicist, maski sa wikipedia entry ay wala itong pangalan
he never heard o may pangalan man lang siya sa scientific community pati na istupidong theory nila
i dont know what is the religious affeliation of this man but judging from his race as indian ay hindi ako nagtataka kung bakit ganyan ang paniniwala nya at nagkaroon siya ng ganyang istupidong theory
he taken it from vedict literature where as the standard big bang was first proposed by a catholic priest from the genesis of the bible at ito naging inspiration nyan since according to vedict ang universe ay eternal
“Material nature and the living entities should be understood to be beginningless. Their transformations and the modes of matter are products of material nature.” - Bhagavad Gita, Chapter 13, Verse 20.
this is one of the 2 example how atheist and scientists s†éáling from the idea of God hahaha
anyway the man is never heard of in scientific community so we can consider it as bogus and pseudo science
duon naman sa isa dinadaldal mo na alternative sa big bang na Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Theorem
there is no way to get rid of a beginning to any universe that is characterized by cosmic expansion (Hav > 0). Since our universe is characterized by cosmic expansion, it must have had a beginning. So, the Borde-Guth-Vilenkin Theorem eliminates the eternal inflation model, which is based upon an ever expanding multiverse.
-Borde, A., A. H. Guth, and A. Vilenkin. 2003. Inflationary spacetimes are not past-complete.
binasa at nauunawaan mo talaga yan o bug0k at b0b0 ka lang talaga
since unanimously the scientist now belive that time and space was originated on big bang tatanga ***** at mangmang ka lang kaya hindi mo matanggap
"The conclusion of this lecture is that the universe has not existed forever. Rather, the universe, and time itself, had a beginning in the Big Bang, about 15 billion years ago." Stephen Hawking -The Beginning of Time
"The Big Bang model of the universe's birth is the most widely accepted model that has ever been conceived for the scientific origin of everything." Stuart Robbins, Case Western Reserve University
"Many once believed that the universe had no beginning or end and was truly infinite. Through the inception of the Big Bang theory, however, no longer could the universe be considered infinite. The universe was forced to take on the properties of a finite phenomenon, possessing a history and a beginning." Chris LaRocco and Blair Rothstein, University of Michigan
"The scientific evidence is now overwhelming that the Universe began with a "Big Bang" ~15 billion (15,000,000,000 or 15E9) years ago." "The Big Bang theory is the most widely accepted theory of the creation of the Universe." Dr. van der Pluijm, University of Michigan
"The present location and velocities of galaxies are a result of a primordial blast known as the BIG BANG. It marked: THE BEGINNING OF THE UNIVERSE! THE BEGINNING OF TIME!" Terry Herter, Cornell University
"That radiation is residual heat from the Big Bang, the event that sparked the beginning of the universe some 13 billion years ago." Craig Hogan, University of Washington
"The universe cannot be infinitely large or infinitely old (it evolves in time)." Nilakshi Veerabathina, Georgia State University
"Evidence suggests that our universe began as an incredibly hot and dense region referred to as a singularity." Stephen T. Abedon, Ohio State University
"A large body of astrophysical observations now clearly points to a beginning for our universe about 15 billion years ago in a cataclysmic outpouring of elementary particles. There is, in fact, no evidence that any of the particles of matter with which we are now familiar existed before this great event." Louis J. Clavelli, Ph.D., Professor of Physics, University of Alabama
"The dominant idea of Cosmology is that the Universe had a beginning." Adam Frank, University of Rochester Department of Physics & Astronomy
bob0 magbase ka sa concencus ng mga scientist, the universe had a beginning at hindi sa mga bag0ng -lumang 20th first pesudo science
who are you to discredit the credential of those scientists, eh mangmang ka taga basa ka lang naman ng bagay na hindi mo nauunawan o ayaw mo tanggapin dahil sa religism mental illness mo kaya wala ka na pag asa matut0 Napapako ka na sa kamangmangan mo dahil sa pagkabulag mo at galit mo sa religion
walang maniniwala sayo dyan sa pesudo science mo ang majority sa kanila ay nagkakaisa sa bagay na yan at maski die hard atheist scientist ay dinidiscredit yang kahibangan mo
