Tamang Relihiyon

ledin · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='Palmeras, c: 941068, m: 749074'][/XX] halos parang gano'n na nga. HAHAHAHAH pero, btw, hindi ka "believer", 'no?

Palmeras · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='ledin, c: 941005, m: 1688694'][/XX] early signs ng pagiging atheist; paniniwala sa higher being pero hindi sa religious groups HAHAHHA (in my case)
danas na danas ko yan tapos pagtaggal mapapagtanto mo na "well this doesn't make any sense" tapos magiging agnostic then boom!

Palmeras · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='ledin, c: 941076, m: 1688694'][/XX] "hindi na" yung tamang term HAHAHAHA

ledin · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='Palmeras, c: 941082, m: 749074'][/XX] akala ko rin dati early signs na yun at road to atheism na talaga ako pero hindi pala talaga eh. HAHAHAHAH hindi ko talaga ma-convince sarili ko na walang higher being kaya naniniwala akong meron. Siguro hindi lang talaga exactly or fully aligned at all times sa definition ng "diyos" na pinaniniwalaan ng kung ano-anong relihiyon haha pero open ako sa discussions about different beliefs.

Sa totoo lang, the reason why lalong hindi ako masyadong kumapit sa konsepto ng religious groups ay dahil sa pagbasa ko ng Bible. Ewan ko kung bakit nila pinagtatalunan 'yan. Wala naman akong nabasang aral sa Bible na pagtalunan nila 'yon. Char. Joke lang. Ang natatandaan kong sabi ro'n kung ano-anong relihiyon daw ang uusbong kaya mag-ingat. HAHAHAHAHA

ledin · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='Palmeras, c: 941088, m: 749074'][/XX] oh, I believe in a higher being pero oks lang kung hindi ka naniniwala. I'm sure you have your reasons why you stopped believing in one. Hahaha.

Palmeras · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='ledin, c: 941116, m: 1688694'][/XX] nung g12 ako nagbabasa ako bible dahil sa influence ng teacher ko tapos lagi ako may dalang bible yung maliit lang, tuwing dadaan akong simbahan nagsa-sign of the cross ako pero hindi ako palasimba HAHAHAHA tas nung nagcollege ako don lang siguro nagbago pananaw ko sa buhay tapos ayun napagtanto ko nga na "hindi naman mahalaga kung may Diyos kang pinaniniwalaan o wala, maging mabuti ka lang na tao oks na yun." ayun narealize ko na wala naman nagbago sa akin nung nananiniwala pa ako at hindi since hindi naman pala ganoon talaga kalalim yung paniniwala ko.

Palmeras · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='ledin, c: 941005, m: 1688694'][/XX] hilig nating gawing chatbox yung comment ng ibang tao ano? HHAHAHA

ledin · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='Palmeras, c: 941166, m: 749074'][/XX] ngi HAHAHAHA halos magkasunod lang pala tayo eh. Teka, PM ko na lang kwento ko about dito. Nakakahiya naman i-share "life story" ko dito. Jk.

Reoberu · Mar 17, 2021

Wards hehe gulo rin beliefs ko

alrich_11 · Mar 17, 2021

mga kaibigan kung iglesia ng Diyos ang pangalan ng tunay na relihiyon...paano yung nabanggit sa roma 16:16 malinaw din naman po pagkakabanggit dun kaso parang hindi pabor sa iba nating kasama dito kaya ginagamit nila yung iglesia ng Diyos yung banggit sa salin ng bibliya...

Gentleman007 · Mar 17, 2021

How Does One Identify the True Religion?

When you compare two religions who both claim to be Christian you must use Scriptural evidence to identify the true Christians. These evidences are not complicated.

Scriptures say true worshipers could be identified in at least three main ways: Love, Truth (Jn.4:23; 17:17), and Fruitage (Mt.7:16ff). Conversely, by these we can also identify the false.

The True religion would be primarily known for it's love toward all (Jn.13:34,35; 1Jn.3:10-12; 4:7, 8). This would include their enemies (Mat.5:44-48; Rom.12:17-20; 1Pet.2:21-23; 3:8- 9). It would not participate in or condone carnal war (2Cor.10:3,4; Isa.2:4).

Apply this basic evidence to what happened in both world wars and current conflicts. People of the same religions met on battlefields and slaughtered one another because of nationalistic differences. Each side claimed to be Christian, and each side was supported by its clergy, who claimed that God was on their side. The definition of a "Christian" is "one who does what Christ would do": WWJD (1 Pet.2:21). That slaughter of "Christian" by "Christian" is rotten fruitage. It is a denial of any claim to being the true Church (cf. Mat.26:52). No Christian would continue to associate with these religions (Rev.18:4). What is the historical record of Catholics and Protestants regarding warfare? Jehovah’s Witnesses have never participated in warfare.

Another evidence is that the true religion would be made up of people who would all be in agreement on doctrine. It would not have members who believe differently on abortion, war, homosexuality or morals. Its members would not "agree to disagree" (1Cor.1:10; 2Cor.13:11; Phil.1:27). True Christians would be separated from the world by "truth" from God's Word the Bible (Jn.17:17; 4:23). All its teachings would be based on the Bible (2 Tim. 3:14-16; Gal. 1:8, 9).

The true religion would have a reputation for promoting exceptional morality in its members (1Cor.6:9,10; Eph.5:3-5; 2 Pet.3:14; 2Cor.7:1; 2Tim.3:5). Does a religion require their congregation members to live moral lives, not allowing practicers of homosexuality, fornication, or adultery to be accepted members of their congregation? Or do they turn a blind eye? If so, their "fruitage" would show they are not true Christians.

True Christians would be associated with God's name: (Jn.17:3,6,26; Acts 15:14/Isa.55:5; 1 Peter 2:9/Ex.19:4- 5; Ps.83:18). They would not use Bibles which have removed the Most Holy Divine Name of God. Replacing the Divine Name with the common noun "Lord" cannot be justified by any translational principles so it is a blatant "subtraction" from God's word which brings a curse on anyone who approves it (Rev.22:18).

The true Church would be engaged in an unprecedented teaching activity (Matthew 24:14, 28:19, 20). Witnesses right now are performing the greatest Bible education work ever done in all human history!

There are more scripture evidences, however these are plenty to show which religion meets the requirements of being the True religion.

Apostate Christianity has neither the spiritual strength nor the support of God's holy spirit to motivate people to follow the truthful teachings of Jesus Christ. For this reason, the result in Christendom is not true Christianity but counterfeit believers, "weeds" unfit for the Kingdom.-Mat13:24ff.

When you examine most religions you find that they cannot meet any of the other requirements of true Christianity. Their historical record is of bloodthirsty wars, immorality, sectarian violence and factional splits (Mat.7:21- 23; 2Tim3:5; Gal.5:19-23). Today Catholics continue to kill Catholics and Protestants kill Protestants, something true Christians would not do (1Jn.3:10,15; 4:8). Our hearts tell us that any religion who is willing to shoot their own members in warfare cannot possibly be trusted to teach Biblical truth.

I have found only one group which has presented absolute evidence of truly being Christian: Jehovah's Witnesses. This is the testimony of the Holy Spirit (1Cor. 6:9-11; Gal.5:19-22).

ledin · Mar 17, 2021

If you don't mind me asking, since what year ka pa po umanib sa current religion mo?

Gentleman007 · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='ledin, c: 941974, m: 1688694'][/XX] 2011

ledin · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='Gentleman007, c: 942031, m: 631158'][/XX] oh, I see. Thanks for answering.

Mind Palace · Mar 17, 2021

So, it means, dalawa o tatlong saksi o dalawa o tatlong nagpapatotoo ang dapat na magkomento dito hahahahahahahahahahaha skl, ge bye ...

Koya Denz · Mar 17, 2021

May punto ka kaibigan.

Mind Palace · Mar 17, 2021

[XX='Koya Denz, c: 945873, m: 1634316'][/XX] May Saksi na nagcomment dito

Just read his comment to this thread .. Yung nsa hulihan .. pero baka nabasa mo na din naman .. hehe

sceixzmic · Apr 9, 2021

[XX='limoto, c: 940875, m: 941055'][/XX] eh Alin ang Iglesia ng Diyos? madami namang relihiyon sa mundo alin doon?

Fury5048 · Apr 9, 2021

Gentleman007 said:
How Does One Identify the True Religion?

When you compare two religions who both claim to be Christian you must use Scriptural evidence to identify the true Christians. These evidences are not complicated.

Scriptures say true worshipers could be identified in at least three main ways: Love, Truth (Jn.4:23; 17:17), and Fruitage (Mt.7:16ff). Conversely, by these we can also identify the false.

The True religion would be primarily known for it's love toward all (Jn.13:34,35; 1Jn.3:10-12; 4:7, 8). This would include their enemies (Mat.5:44-48; Rom.12:17-20; 1Pet.2:21-23; 3:8- 9). It would not participate in or condone carnal war (2Cor.10:3,4; Isa.2:4).

Apply this basic evidence to what happened in both world wars and current conflicts. People of the same religions met on battlefields and slaughtered one another because of nationalistic differences. Each side claimed to be Christian, and each side was supported by its clergy, who claimed that God was on their side. The definition of a "Christian" is "one who does what Christ would do": WWJD (1 Pet.2:21). That slaughter of "Christian" by "Christian" is rotten fruitage. It is a denial of any claim to being the true Church (cf. Mat.26:52). No Christian would continue to associate with these religions (Rev.18:4). What is the historical record of Catholics and Protestants regarding warfare? Jehovah’s Witnesses have never participated in warfare.

Another evidence is that the true religion would be made up of people who would all be in agreement on doctrine. It would not have members who believe differently on abortion, war, homosexuality or morals. Its members would not "agree to disagree" (1Cor.1:10; 2Cor.13:11; Phil.1:27). True Christians would be separated from the world by "truth" from God's Word the Bible (Jn.17:17; 4:23). All its teachings would be based on the Bible (2 Tim. 3:14-16; Gal. 1:8, 9).

The true religion would have a reputation for promoting exceptional morality in its members (1Cor.6:9,10; Eph.5:3-5; 2 Pet.3:14; 2Cor.7:1; 2Tim.3:5). Does a religion require their congregation members to live moral lives, not allowing practicers of homosexuality, fornication, or adultery to be accepted members of their congregation? Or do they turn a blind eye? If so, their "fruitage" would show they are not true Christians.

True Christians would be associated with God's name: (Jn.17:3,6,26; Acts 15:14/Isa.55:5; 1 Peter 2:9/Ex.19:4- 5; Ps.83:18). They would not use Bibles which have removed the Most Holy Divine Name of God. Replacing the Divine Name with the common noun "Lord" cannot be justified by any translational principles so it is a blatant "subtraction" from God's word which brings a curse on anyone who approves it (Rev.22:18).

The true Church would be engaged in an unprecedented teaching activity (Matthew 24:14, 28:19, 20). Witnesses right now are performing the greatest Bible education work ever done in all human history!

There are more scripture evidences, however these are plenty to show which religion meets the requirements of being the True religion.

Apostate Christianity has neither the spiritual strength nor the support of God's holy spirit to motivate people to follow the truthful teachings of Jesus Christ. For this reason, the result in Christendom is not true Christianity but counterfeit believers, "weeds" unfit for the Kingdom.-Mat13:24ff.

When you examine most religions you find that they cannot meet any of the other requirements of true Christianity. Their historical record is of bloodthirsty wars, immorality, sectarian violence and factional splits (Mat.7:21- 23; 2Tim3:5; Gal.5:19-23). Today Catholics continue to kill Catholics and Protestants kill Protestants, something true Christians would not do (1Jn.3:10,15; 4:8). Our hearts tell us that any religion who is willing to shoot their own members in warfare cannot possibly be trusted to teach Biblical truth.

I have found only one group which has presented absolute evidence of truly being Christian: Jehovah's Witnesses. This is the testimony of the Holy Spirit (1Cor. 6:9-11; Gal.5:19-22).