Sabi, Nasasaad Daw sa Biblia na Meron Tao na Hindi Maniniwala sa Diyos, Ang Ibig Sabihin na Naka-Destiny Ang Atheist na Mag-Eexist sa Mundo

[PHC_Komorebi]

so you really think na ang isang taong hindi pa nakain ng religion ang utak ay magsasabi ng ganoong phrase?

Pre naniniwala kaba sa multo?

 

[Madin08]

so you really think na ang isang taong hindi pa nakain ng religion ang utak ay magsasabi ng ganoong phrase?

bahala kayo awit ang gusto ko lang ay mapanood nio para malaman ang insight nio about don wala na ko magagawa kung sarado ke religious sya atheist man o ano sya na yun parang kasi ay bias kapag religious na tao o athiest di na pakikingan haha

 

[PHC_Komorebi]

Feel mo lang pala! Kung feel mo lang , huwag mo pilitin sa akin na mag-agree ako sa mga "accusation" mo dahil feel mo lang pala iyon. Hindi ka nakikipag-away pero ikaw ang nagproprovoke na magkaroon ng away at para matigilan ito , kailangan maingat ka sa mga sasabihin mo.

Kaya nagkakaroon ng "heated" dito na pwede magkaroon ng inclination ng "away" dahil ipinipilit mo ang gusto mo mangyari kaya huwag mo ipipilit kungdi "sasabog" tayo dalawa. Magkakaroon na ito ng away.
​

Ha? Hindi kita pinipilit. Nag proved lang dn ako na hindi totoo ang free will. Yung AI mo na sagot yan lang baguhin mo salamat

 

[Asherah Goddess]

Ha? Hindi kita pinipilit. Nag proved lang dn ako na hindi totoo ang free will. Yung AI mo na sagot yan lang baguhin mo salamat ​

Pinipilit mo. Huwag kang makulit. Kung totoo ang sinasabi mo , baguhin mo ang accusation mo sa akin dahil mali ang parata mo sa akin. Same lang tayo nagpipilitan. Pinipilit mo.
​

 

[PHC_Komorebi]

Pinipilit mo. Huwag kang makulit. Kung totoo ang sinasabi mo , baguhin mo ang accusation mo sa akin dahil mali ang parata mo sa akin. Same lang tayo nagpipilitan. Pinipilit mo.
​

Okay po AI.

 

[plhbg1]

Pre naniniwala kaba sa multo?

i cannot engage to any form of belief boss, i only do describing, so if multo is observable then i would describe it instead of believing on it

bahala kayo awit ang gusto ko lang ay mapanood nio para malaman ang insight nio about don wala na ko magagawa kung sarado ke religious sya atheist man o ano sya na yun parang kasi ay bias kapag religious na tao o athiest di na pakikingan haha

nope, ang dami kong religious na tao na pinapakinggan, yung mga professors dito sa UP are religious pero ang sarap pakinggan pag nag discuss sila sa lessons, that means i can actually listen to religious people as long as they don't speak about religion

to the max pa talaga promotion mo sa kanya na he'll speak about science pero yung intro niya "going to hell" haha

 

[PHC_Komorebi]

i cannot engage to any form of belief boss, i only do describing, so if multo is observable then i would describe it instead of believing on it

nope, ang dami kong religious na tao na pinapakinggan, yung mga professors dito sa UP are religious pero ang sarap pakinggan pag nag discuss sila sa lessons, that means i can actually listen to religious people as long as they don't speak about religion

to the max pa talaga promotion mo sa kanya na he'll speak about science pero yung intro niya "going to hell" haha

You cannot engage on something even you believed it exist. Dahil atheist ka? Ganun ba yun pre?

 

[plhbg1]

You cannot engage on something even you believed it exist. Dahil atheist ka? Ganun ba yun pre?

did not say i cannot engage on something, i said i cannot engage in any form of belief hehe i do describing instead of believing

 

[Madin08]

i cannot engage to any form of belief boss, i only do describing, so if multo is observable then i would describe it instead of believing on it

nope, ang dami kong religious na tao na pinapakinggan, yung mga professors dito sa UP are religious pero ang sarap pakinggan pag nag discuss sila sa lessons, that means i can actually listen to religious people as long as they don't speak about religion

to the max pa talaga promotion mo sa kanya na he'll speak about science pero yung intro niya "going to hell" haha

di namn sya nag speak ng religion oh nag prpromote ng kung ano yung paliwnag nya kasi malinaw at nag speak sya ng going to hell dahil yun ang topic matatamaan talaga ang topic na predestination ang religion kasi yun ung punto don gets mo so kung ayaw mo panoorin di wag di ko sya prinopromote yung paliwanag nya lang ang gusto ko mapakingan nnio haha

 

[plhbg1]

di namn sya nag speak ng religion oh nag prpromote ng kung ano yung paliwnag nya kasi malinaw at nag speak sya ng going to hell dahil yun ang topic matatamaan talaga ang topic na predestination ang religion kasi yun ung punto don gets mo so kung ayaw mo panoorin di wag di ko sya prinopromote yung paliwanag nya lang ang gusto ko mapakingan nnio haha

pinanood ko na talaga boss kasi i trusted you but it turned out he made multiverse a scientific theory even if it is not, it is only a hypothesis that arises from different fields starting from physics up to the field of speculative fiction, very wrong

 

[Asherah Goddess]

Okay po AI.

Okay po , baliw.

 

[PHC_Komorebi]

did not say i cannot engage on something, i said i cannot engage in any form of belief hehe i do describing instead of believing

Ah so parang pag nagkataon lang sa gusto pala hahaha, pwedi mo pag pilian kung gusto mo lang e describe or you believe on something

 

[plhbg1]

Ah so parang pag nagkataon lang sa gusto pala hahaha, pwedi mo pag pilian kung gusto mo lang e describe or you believe on something

we are not capable of believing something that we are already observing haha nasa harap muna believing ka pa din? we only believe those things that cannot be observed, sample is god, we cannot observe god so all we can do is just believe in god, kaya nga tawag is belief

on the other hand we also have so-called observable things like stars, they are readily observable using telescope so we no longer believe but describe them that "they are stars"

that's what science do, only describing the things observed, there is no belief in science

 

[Asherah Goddess]

Okay po AI.

Okay po. Ikaw, baliw. Baliw ka sa kaka-akusa sa akin ng AI.
​

 

[PHC_Komorebi]

we are not capable of believing something that we are already observing haha nasa harap muna believing ka pa din? we only believe those things that cannot be observed, sample is god, we cannot observe god so all we can do is just believe in god, kaya nga tawag is belief

on the other hand we also have so-called observable things like stars, they are readily observable using telescope so we no longer believe but describe them that "they are stars"

that's what science do, only describing the things observed, there is no belief in science

Sabi mo kasi you can't engage on something to believe. Kaya nga tinanong kita tungkol sa multo kung naniniwala ka. Sabi mo you can describe it instead of believing. (Dito na sense na alam mo din nag eexist ang multo (ghost)). Mukhang inaayon mo lang nga hahaha. Sabi mo pa if science is more on describing than believing, how about the belief about Charles Darwin's theory of evolution? Theory=unproven, but they believe it could be.

 

[plhbg1]

Sabi mo kasi you can't engage on something to believe. Kaya nga tinanong kita tungkol sa multo kung naniniwala ka. Sabi mo you can describe it instead of believing. (Dito na sense na alam mo din nag eexist ang multo (ghost)). Mukhang inaayon mo lang nga hahaha. Sabi mo pa if science is more on describing than believing, how about the belief about Charles Darwin's theory of evolution? Theory=unproven, but they believe it could be.

meron condition iyan boss in order for us to be able to describe something, it should be observable, if only a ghost is observable then i can describe it, science is not more on describing than believing, it is describing and not believing, there is no belief in science, tungkol naman sa theory of evolution, science just described those fossils as "remains of the ancient" by performing carbon dating to them and be able to describe how many years ago that these fossils started to exist, iba kasi ang scientific theory sa theory theory lang hehe meron iyan evidence bossing

 

[PHC_Komorebi]

meron condition iyan boss in order for us to be able to describe something, it should be observable, if only a ghost is observable then i can describe it, science is not more on describing than believing, it is describing and not believing, there is no belief in science, tungkol naman sa theory of evolution, science just described those fossils as "remains of the ancient" by performing carbon dating to them and be able to describe how many years ago that these fossils started to exist, iba kasi ang scientific theory sa theory theory lang hehe meron iyan evidence bossing

So bilang atheist, does ghost exist?

 

[plhbg1]

So bilang atheist, does ghost exist?

i would say it is unknown at the moment, science is still waiting to observe one

 

[PHC_Komorebi]

i would say it is unknown at the moment, science is still waiting to observe one

Lol. A lot of evidence was already provided by natural phenomenon about ghost existence.

 

[plhbg1]

Lol. A lot of evidence was already provided by natural phenomenon about ghost existence.

like what for example boss?