ang layo naman ng sagot mo.
tinanong kita kung ung claim mo na if a person dies, then that's it. is it the absolute truth that death is the end of all. that is why i ask you kung napasok mo ung 'consiousness' ng namatay na tao para masabi mo na everything is no more.
again, mayroon ka bang experimental proof na ang tao na namatay his consciousness also disappears ba.
look, kung gumagamit ka ng science and or reason, i do too. it is only that i am more open minded than you because you re closing all kinds of inquiry and that you presume without proof that death is the ultimate. but how do you know. sumakabilang buhay ka na ba. i am not also sure if there is an after life nor it is proven that there is an after life pero a scientific attitude also requires an open mind in this case, the condition of the dead. sa ating mga buhay, the dead is dead but we do not know if that dead or the consciousness of that dead is now on the otherside or afterlife.the existence of an afterlife or the other side is not unscientific nor diminish a mind rational or of an intelligent person. sa ngayon lang perhaps we do not have yet the reception or scientific power to tap this afterlife or otherside.
now, you can not say that you are more rational than me as i have explained above. a dumb person will say this death is the ultimate. ultimate in what sense if we can not even experience the death or enter the consiousness or spirit of the dead person if you know what i mean.
For others like me, it's better to believe in what we see than to believe on something that has no proof. This becoming more and more funny hahaha
i can not see the air and yet i believe. i can not see gravity and yet i believe. the ancients have no knowledg of what these molecules are or these atoms are, and these cells in our body..before, they thought cells were just mere blobs but then as science modernize too, now the cell is a very complex system of its own. i know this is very simplistic but what is your ultimate authority that if something has no proof it doesnt exists. if our present measurement or technology can not venture into something, that means it doesnt exist ba. is that your scientific attitude if you are trying to be scientific, then you are actually ironic because a scientific attitude requires an open mind that all questions and issues can not be answered once and for all in a single lifetime or even in a thousands of years. the knowledge you have is only relative to your time and limit of your experience inlcuding that of science, technology, philosophy and religion.