What's new

Tutulongan moba kasi yun ang akma or hindi ka tutulong para sa paniniwala.

Status
Not open for further replies.
refer ka nlg po sa definition ng scientific Theory at theory sa last post ko with Wikipedia source. saying its just a theory is an understatement.

hindi sya understatement dahil di siya fact merong mga scientific fact na kahit baliktarin mo ang mundo ay proven to be true. know the difference between facts and theories stop being delusional and claim that scientific theories are indeed facts.
 
Okay nag kamali ako diyan nalimotan kong ilagay ang accepted by most astronomical community
Ang ibig kung sabihin accepted bilang scientific theory

Anong saan yung test marunong kabang mag basa o baka hindi mo alam ano ang scientific methods wahahahaha nakaka tawa yung taong pa ulit ulit mong natusta tas sasabihan ka ng mang mang wahahaha alam mo gusto ko yan ulitin mo nga kasi sa sinasabi mong yan pawang patama ata sayo

Scientific method :
A method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses

What may mga magandang aral therefore yung dalawang yan deserving na pwedi maging totoo tsk tsk tsk

Men ano ba na kain mo kulang ba sa sustansya ulam mo kanina ?

Yung simulation theory naman dalawang bisis ko palang panood yan hindi ko pa matandaan yung mga ditalyi matagal na kasi akong hindi sumisilip ng ganyan mga 2016 ata yung last sa nabasa ko hypothesis ata yan at magka iba ang scientific theory sa hypothesis hmmm no comment muna ako dyan

Anyway kung sakaling kaya mong ma disprove ang big bang theory sabihan mo lang ako ha
Hahahaha

salamat at sinabi mo na sinungaling ka buko ka na wala ng maniniwala sayo sa pinagsasabi mo in the future. so wag ka na mag rebuttal dahil exposed ka na.

walang pinag ka iba ang simulation theory sa bigbang theory pareho silang theory marami ngang scientist at matatalinong tao ang nag lean sa simulation theory kagaya ni elon musk

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Is our world a simulation? Why some scientists say it's more likely than not
A swath of technologists and physicists believe that ‘simulation theory’ will be proved, just as it was proved that the Earth was not the center of the universe

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in San Francisco

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Email
Tue 11 Oct 2016 13.30 BSTLast modified on Mon 9 Jul 2018 12.16 BST

Shares
57,046
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
3500.jpg
Elon Musk is among those who believe we may be living in a simulated universe. Photograph: Stringer/Reuters

exposed ka na.
 

Attachments

hindi sya understatement dahil di siya fact merong mga scientific fact na kahit baliktarin mo ang mundo ay proven to be true. know the difference between facts and theories stop being delusional and claim that scientific theories are indeed facts.
refer ka nlg po sa Wikipedia sa definition ng theory at fact, mukhang hindi mo naiintindihan ang pinagkaiba nila.
 
refer ka nlg po sa Wikipedia sa definition ng theory at fact, mukhang hindi mo naiintindihan ang pinagkaiba nila.

ayan galing tong wikipedia binasa ko lahat

Theories formally and scientifically[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.]
Main article: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Theories are You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. tools for You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and making You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. about a given subject matter. There are theories in many and varied fields of study, including the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. A formal theory is You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in nature and is only meaningful when given a You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. component by applying it to some content (e.g., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and relationships of the actual historical world as it is unfolding). Theories in various fields of study are expressed in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., but are always constructed in such a way that their general form is identical to a theory as it is expressed in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Theories may be expressed mathematically, symbolically, or in common language, but are generally expected to follow principles of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Theory is constructed of a set of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. that are entirely true statements about the subject under consideration. However, the truth of any one of these statements is always relative to the whole theory. Therefore, the same statement may be true with respect to one theory, and not true with respect to another. This is, in ordinary language, where statements such as "He is a terrible person" cannot be judged as true or false without reference to some You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. of who "He" is and for that matter what a "terrible person" is under the theory.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Regarding the term theoretical[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.]

Acceptance of a theory does not require that all of its major predictions be tested[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.], if it is already supported by sufficiently strong evidence. For example, certain tests may be infeasible or technically difficult. As a result, theories may make predictions that have not yet been confirmed or proven incorrect; in this case, the predicted results may be described informally using the term "theoretical." These predictions can be tested at a later time, and if they are incorrect, this may lead to revision, invalidation, or rejection of the theory.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

so ano pa gusto mo?

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - fact vs theory vs hypothesis vs law difference

minsan manood ka ng mga video sa YøùTùbé madali lang malaman pagkakaiba ng facts at theory.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. -scientific law vs theory difference.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. -richard dawkins it just a theory

mismo si richard dawkins nag sabi na ang evolution ay isa paring theory wag mo sabihin na mas marunong ka pa sa kanya. lol.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - tom wolfe darwin's evolution theory is a myth.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - many scientist rejects drawin's theory today.

mag search ka tungkol sa dna at fossils records. dna proves evolution is incorrect.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - the science delusion. Rupert Sheldrake at TEDx Whitechapel
 
Last edited:
ayan galing tong wikipedia binasa ko lahat

Theories formally and scientifically[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.]
Main article: You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
Theories are You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. tools for You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., and making You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. about a given subject matter. There are theories in many and varied fields of study, including the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. A formal theory is You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in nature and is only meaningful when given a You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. component by applying it to some content (e.g., You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and relationships of the actual historical world as it is unfolding). Theories in various fields of study are expressed in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., but are always constructed in such a way that their general form is identical to a theory as it is expressed in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Theories may be expressed mathematically, symbolically, or in common language, but are generally expected to follow principles of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

Theory is constructed of a set of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. that are entirely true statements about the subject under consideration. However, the truth of any one of these statements is always relative to the whole theory. Therefore, the same statement may be true with respect to one theory, and not true with respect to another. This is, in ordinary language, where statements such as "He is a terrible person" cannot be judged as true or false without reference to some You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. of who "He" is and for that matter what a "terrible person" is under the theory.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Regarding the term theoretical[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.]

Acceptance of a theory does not require that all of its major predictions be tested[You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.], if it is already supported by sufficiently strong evidence. For example, certain tests may be infeasible or technically difficult. As a result, theories may make predictions that have not yet been confirmed or proven incorrect; in this case, the predicted results may be described informally using the term "theoretical." These predictions can be tested at a later time, and if they are incorrect, this may lead to revision, invalidation, or rejection of the theory.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

so ano pa gusto mo?

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - fact vs theory vs hypothesis vs law difference

minsan manood ka ng mga video sa yôutubê madali lang malaman pagkakaiba ng facts at theory.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. -scientific law vs theory difference.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. -richard dawkins it just a theory

mismo si richard dawkins nag sabi na ang evolution ay isa paring theory wag mo sabihin na mas marunong ka pa sa kanya. lol.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - tom wolfe darwin's evolution theory is a myth.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - many scientist rejects drawin's theory today.

mag search ka tungkol sa dna at fossils records. dna proves evolution is incorrect.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. - the science delusion. Rupert Sheldrake at TEDx Whitechapel
A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. world that can be You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and verified in accordance with the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., using accepted You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

The meaning of the term scientific theory(often contracted to theory for brevity) as used in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. is significantly different from the common You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. usage of theory.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. In everyday speech, theory can imply an explanation that represents an unsubstantiated and speculative You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.whereas in science it describes an explanation that has been tested and widely accepted as valid. These different usages are comparable to the opposing usages of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in science versus common speech, where it denotes a mere hope.

The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain and its simplicity. As additional You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.is gathered, a scientific theory may be modified and ultimately rejected if it cannot be made to fit the new findings; in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then required. That doesn’t mean that all theories can be fundamentally changed (for example, well established foundational scientific theories such as evolution, heliocentric theory, cell theory, theory of plate tectonics etc). In certain cases, the less-accurate unmodified scientific theory can still be treated as a theory if it is useful (due to its sheer simplicity) as an approximation under specific conditions. A case in point is You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., which can serve as an approximation to You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. at velocities that are small relative to the speed of light.

Scientific theories are You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and make You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. They describe the causes of a particular natural phenomenon and are used to explain and predict aspects of the physical You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or specific areas of inquiry (for example, electricity, chemistry, and astronomy). Scientists use theories to further scientific knowledge, as well as to facilitate advances in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

As with other forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are both You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. aiming for You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

The You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. wrote that "...facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts."You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
salamat at sinabi mo na sinungaling ka buko ka na wala ng maniniwala sayo sa pinagsasabi mo in the future. so wag ka na mag rebuttal dahil exposed ka na.

walang pinag ka iba ang simulation theory sa bigbang theory pareho silang theory marami ngang scientist at matatalinong tao ang nag lean sa simulation theory kagaya ni elon musk

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Is our world a simulation? Why some scientists say it's more likely than not
A swath of technologists and physicists believe that ‘simulation theory’ will be proved, just as it was proved that the Earth was not the center of the universe

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in San Francisco

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Email
Tue 11 Oct 2016 13.30 BSTLast modified on Mon 9 Jul 2018 12.16 BST

Shares
57,046
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
3500.jpg
Elon Musk is among those who believe we may be living in a simulated universe. Photograph: Stringer/Reuters

exposed ka na.
Wahahaha yang pinagsasabi mo was nothing to do with atheism may Adrian broner pala sa isang debate hahaha ?

Andaming sinasabi at andaming mali pero may gana pang mag trash talk hahahaha ano naman kung walang pinag kaiba ang simulation theory sa big bang theory hindi ako nag claimed tungkol jan sinabi kong no comment ako dyan

Since Wikipedia say it's a hypothesis
Simulated reality is the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. that You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.could be simulated—for example by You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.—to a degree indistinguishable from "true" reality. It could contain conscious minds which may or may not be fully aware that they are living inside a simulation.

Mahirap na mag salita kaya no comment ako sa mga ganyan dahil tulad ng nangyari general theory of relativity at quantum mechanics na mag kaiba ang pag described nila sa reality but scientists created string theory to reconcile the two theory

Though simulation reality could be possible but if any changes im open with it a soon as it will be a scientific theory

Agnostic kaba talaga or self proclaim kalang kasi parang mas flexible pa ata ako sayo eyy ikaw sinabi mo na pariho lang ang big bang at simulation theory which is hindi pa yan tukoy kung compatible nga sila

Maybe possible na simulation can explain the origin of the big bang but also string theory possible din kaya nga hindi natin trabaho yan diba agnostic ka bat ka nakiki alam sa mga bagay nayan since ang mga yan pwedi pang mag bago

wala na akong paki dyan hindi ako scientist para paki alaman ang mga yan ang sa akin lang wag mong ikumpara ang naniniwala sa scientific theory sa naniniwala sa isang God

Mahilig kang kumuha ng meaning pero ngayon anong nangyari ?

Puro ka “buko kana” wahahaha men kung kulang ang sustansya ng mga pagkaing kinakain mo sana wag mong ipahalata kaya kung hindi mo naman ma afford ang mga masustansyan pagkain tira ka nalang dito sa amin kahit papano dika makakain ng dilata at iba pang preservatives

Sinabi mong hindi ka maniniwala sa theory hanggat hindi napatunayan ni hindi mo nga alam ang kung bakit naging scientific theory ang isang theory

At ngayon naniniwala ka sa simulation theory wahahaha andami mong mga mali
Una naging fallacious ka , pangalawa andami mong sinasabi na mga bagay na hindi mo pinag iisipan at pangatlo kino contradict mo sarili mong statement wahahaha

Men talo kana wag mo ng e try na bumawi sa pamamagitan ng paglihis ng ibang argument dahil ginagawa mo na yan mula pa noong una pero lalo kalang nagmumukang ignoranti
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Wahahaha yang pinagsasabi mo was nothing to do with atheism may Adrian broner pala sa isang debate hahaha ?

Andaming sinasabi at andaming mali pero may gana pang mag trash talk hahahaha ano naman kung walang pinag kaiba ang simulation theory sa big bang theory hindi ako nag claimed tungkol jan sinabi kong no comment ako dyan

Since Wikipedia say it's a hypothesis
Simulated reality is the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. that You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.could be simulated—for example by You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.—to a degree indistinguishable from "true" reality. It could contain conscious minds which may or may not be fully aware that they are living inside a simulation.

Mahirap na mag salita kaya no comment ako sa mga ganyan dahil tulad ng nangyari general theory of relativity at quantum mechanics na mag kaiba ang pag described nila sa reality but scientists created string theory to reconcile the two theory

Though simulation reality could be possible but if any changes im open with it a soon as it will be a scientific theory

Agnostic kaba talaga or self proclaim kalang kasi parang mas flexible pa ata ako sayo eyy ikaw sinabi mo na pariho lang ang big bang at simulation theory which is hindi pa yan tukoy kung compatible nga sila

Maybe possible na simulation can explain the origin of the big bang but also string theory possible din kaya nga hindi natin trabaho yan diba agnostic ka bat ka nakiki alam sa mga bagay nayan since ang mga yan pwedi pang mag bago

wala na akong paki dyan hindi ako scientist para paki alaman ang mga yan ang sa akin lang wag mong ikumpara ang naniniwala sa scientific theory sa naniniwala sa isang God

Mahilig kang kumuha ng meaning pero ngayon anong nangyari ?

Puro ka “buko kana” wahahaha men kung kulang ang sustansya ng mga pagkaing kinakain mo sana wag mong ipahalata kaya kung hindi mo naman ma afford ang mga masustansyan pagkain tira ka nalang dito sa amin kahit papano dika makakain ng dilata at iba pang preservatives

Sinabi mong hindi ka maniniwala sa theory hanggat hindi napatunayan ni hindi mo nga alam ang kung bakit naging scientific theory ang isang theory

At ngayon naniniwala ka sa simulation theory wahahaha andami mong mga mali
Una naging fallacious ka , pangalawa andami mong sinasabi na mga bagay na hindi mo pinag iisipan at pangatlo kino contradict mo sarili mong statement wahahaha

Men talo kana wag mo ng e try na bumawi sa pamamagitan ng paglihis ng ibang argument dahil ginagawa mo na yan mula pa noong una pero lalo kalang nagmumukang ignoranti

wala ka na pala co-comment dapat di na ka nag reply wala namang substance ung mga sinabi mo. ang nabasa ko sa sinabi mo wala ka ng comment at para kang bata na nag de-deny na hindi kita na taya lol. 27 yrs old ka na don't be a manchild.lol. maraming YøùTùbé videos dyan na binigay ko ung link.

wala na akong paki dyan hindi ako scientist para paki alaman ang mga yan ang sa akin lang wag mong ikumpara ang naniniwala sa scientific theory sa naniniwala sa isang God


buti sinabi mo na wag mo kumpara ang naniniwala sa scientific theory sa naniniwala kay god di ka pala scientist edi sino nag bigay sayo ng authority nag bawalan ako? exposed ka nanaman na may agenda ka lang maraming scientist na naniniwala na may higher being or god. example physicist michio kaku ,scientist Rupert Sheldrake at marami pang iba dami mo ng strike sinungaling ka. wag mo pasok agenda mo dito antigod ka lang talaga lol. aminin mo. wala kang pake pero wag daw paki alamanan lumalabas na ung totoo mong kulay. lol. wala kang authority para diktahan kahit sino na pag usapan ang isang bagay wag kang hampas luma di ka diyos.
 
Last edited:
A scientific theory is an explanation of an aspect of the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. world that can be You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and verified in accordance with the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., using accepted You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., measurement, and evaluation of results. Where possible, theories are tested under controlled conditions in an You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.. Established scientific theories have withstood rigorous scrutiny and embody scientific You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

The meaning of the term scientific theory(often contracted to theory for brevity) as used in the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. is significantly different from the common You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. usage of theory.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. In everyday speech, theory can imply an explanation that represents an unsubstantiated and speculative You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.whereas in science it describes an explanation that has been tested and widely accepted as valid. These different usages are comparable to the opposing usages of You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. in science versus common speech, where it denotes a mere hope.

The strength of a scientific theory is related to the diversity of phenomena it can explain and its simplicity. As additional You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.is gathered, a scientific theory may be modified and ultimately rejected if it cannot be made to fit the new findings; in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then required. That doesn’t mean that all theories can be fundamentally changed (for example, well established foundational scientific theories such as evolution, heliocentric theory, cell theory, theory of plate tectonics etc). In certain cases, the less-accurate unmodified scientific theory can still be treated as a theory if it is useful (due to its ***** simplicity) as an approximation under specific conditions. A case in point is You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now., which can serve as an approximation to You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. at velocities that are small relative to the speed of light.

Scientific theories are You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and make You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. They describe the causes of a particular natural phenomenon and are used to explain and predict aspects of the physical You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or specific areas of inquiry (for example, electricity, chemistry, and astronomy). Scientists use theories to further scientific knowledge, as well as to facilitate advances in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

As with other forms of scientific knowledge, scientific theories are both You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. aiming for You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. and You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

The You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. wrote that "...facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world's data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts."You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

did you watched the videos? or you're just dumb?
 
no it says a theory cannot be a law. and a theory is tested tru time but is still subjected to changes or rejection.
haha, uo nga same lng binasa mo ba ung wiki?

a scientific theory may be modified and ultimately rejected if it cannot be made to fit the new findings; in such circumstances, a more accurate theory is then required. That doesn’t mean that all theories can be fundamentally changed (for example, well established foundational scientific theories such as evolution, heliocentric theory, cell theory, theory of plate tectonics etc).
 
haha, uo nga same lng binasa mo ba ung wiki?

o edi di fact ang theory because facts is ultimately and undeniably true just like law. example newton's law of gravity it's not a theory it is a law. unlike theory it is still in question and still subjected to improvement,adjustment,amendment,change or in the latter part rejection. mismo si richard dawkins na nag sabi na di fact ang theory kaya wag mo pag pilitan na fact ang theory.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. -richard dawkins it just a theory
 
o edi di fact ang theory because facts is ultimately and undeniably true just like law. example newton's law of gravity it's not a theory it is a law. unlike theory it is still in question and still subjected to improvement,adjustment,amendment,change or in the latter part rejection.

newton's law of universal gravitation doesn't describe what is happening or why, to do that we need the theory of gravity

- source vid

sure ka napanood mo ung vid?
 
newton's law of universal gravitation doesn't describe what is happening or why, to do that we need the theory of gravity

- source vid

sure ka napanood mo ung vid?

aba t@nga ka ata kung panonood mo ung video sa una palang sinabi na law predicts and calculates a baseball travel when launch. a theory only propose why things happens.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. -TED ed

0:00 - 1:20 ung time kung di ka t@nga.

kahit mag search ka sa google walang theory of gravity.
 
Last edited:
aba t@nga ka ata kung panonood mo ung video sa una palang sinabi na law predicts and calculates a basebase travel when launch. a theory only propose why things happens.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

0:00 - 1:20 ung time kung di ka t@nga.
haha, yan ung sa wiki din eh, di mo ata binasa sample kita ah,

apples fall to the ground - fact
how the apple fell to the ground - law
why the apple fell to the ground - theory

- theory use case

Scientists use theories to further scientific knowledge, as well as to facilitate advances in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

sa baseball analogy sa vid, kilangan mo ng newtons law of universal gravitation which needs the Theory of gravity.

kahit mag search ka sa google walang theory of gravity.
Einstein's Theory of General Relativity
 
haha, yan ung sa wiki din eh, di mo ata binasa sample kita ah,

apples fall to the ground - fact
how the apple fell to the ground - law
why the apple fell to the ground - theory

- theory use case

Scientists use theories to further scientific knowledge, as well as to facilitate advances in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..

sa baseball analogy sa vid, kilangan mo ng newtons law of universal gravitation which needs the Theory of gravity.

a theory is still a theory and not a fact. because theory is subjected to changes and rejection. watch the video

einstein's theory of relativity isn't a law it is a theory and doesn't explain newton's law of gravity quite it is the opposite.

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited:
a theory is still a theory and not a fact. because theory is subjected to changes and rejection. watch the video
a blueprint of a house is a theory of the house not a fact.
a blueprint is subjected to changes and rejections, yet it is widely used to build anything.

your comparing a blueprint of the house with the real house and saying the blueprint is not a real house, congratulations you just won a medal.
 
a blueprint of a house is a theory of the house not a fact.
a blueprint is subjected to changes and rejections, yet it is widely used to build anything.

your comparing a blueprint of the house with the real house and saying the blueprint is not a real house, congratulations you just won a medal.

yeah did you watch the video or you're just making excuses? theories are not facts. and theories can be subjected to changes or if proven wrong rejection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Back
Top