Closed Chiong sister case

https://phc.onl/#forbidden#/6ShYVjz5L0s Sino po may alam sa kwento ito kasi sabi nila ay napaikot nila ang batas noon kaya ngayon ang mga netizen ay humihingi ng petition para buksab ulit ang kaso.

 

[JhanuzOne]

Yung mga taga-cebu kasi malakas na pamilya daw yang chiong sa cebu at dahil madidiin sila sa kaso ang tatay ng chiong na kapit kay peter lim sikat na druglord yung tinutugis ni du30 ngayon ginawa nilang paraan ang pagkawala/pagkamatay ng anak nila para malihis sa kaso yung tatay.. sabi sabi na buhay ang magkapatid at naninirahan o nagtatago sa ibang bansa..

Basta sa video kung napanuod mo maraming butas yung kaso... Dahil sa media at malakas sa president erap yung pamilya nakasuhan yung anim lalo na yung kontrobersyal na si PACO

 

[awinahe]

Read the interesting article "Why 'Jacqueline Comes Home' is problematic" here:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[ukruskater]

conspiracy hmmmm

 

[goyynb]

Yesh grabeh ang connection nag mga chiong taga cebu po ako... binansagan din yan trial of cebu

 

[cookiecha321]

helllo poooo sa mga di po nakakaalam tungkol sa case na iyan watch niyo po " give up tomorrow" sa YøùTùbé. sikat na ito ngayon ... sana may gawin si duterte... meron nga ba or proprotektahan nya cronies nya? kung di niyo alam marami siyang friends na intsik sana may gawin sya hai.....supporter ako ni duterte pero paminsan yung mga platforms nya puro pro business man lang.... like yung aalis siya sa icc , ayaw nya pinapakelaman sya ng international court eh hello if yung sa dati if di nakialam ang spain eh di nbubulok na ngayon sa kulungan si paco or worst pinapatay na ni chiong yan.... second, ano laban mo sa instik haha ,,, daming connections dito sa pinas

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

Ang hirap naman tlga nung kaso na yan, meron nga possibility na meron cover up kasi yung pamilya nang biktima ay promenente diba? Anu ba yung mga suspect, magkakilala ba sila nang mga biktima? Sorry di ako pwede mag YøùTùbé ngayun.

wait basahin ko nalang sa wikipedia

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Defense
Forty-two witnesses,You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. including Larrañaga’s teachers and classmates at the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. (CCA) in Quezon City, testified under oath that he was in Quezon City, when the crime is said to have taken place in You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now..You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. However, the trial court considered these testimonies irrelevant, rejecting these as coming from "friends of the accused," and they were not admitted.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. During his trial in the Cebu Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 7, defense lawyers sought to present evidence of his whereabouts on the evening of the crime—that Larrañaga, at that time 19 years old, was at a party at the R&R Restaurant along Katipunan Avenue, Quezon City, and stayed there until early morning the following day. After the party, the logbook of the security guard at Larrañaga's ******inium indicates that Larrañaga returned to his Quezon City ******inium at 2:45 a.m.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Rowena Bautista, an instructor and chef at the culinary center, said Larrañaga was in school from 8 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. and saw him again at about 6:30 p.m on July 16.You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. The school’s registrar, Caroline Calleja, said she proctored a two-hour exam where Larrañaga was present from 1:30 p.m. Larrañaga attended his second round of midterm exams on July 17 commencing at 8 a.m. Only then did Larrañaga leave for Cebu in the late afternoon of July 17, 1997.

Airline and airport personnel also came to court with their flight records, indicating that Larrañaga did not take any flight on July 16, 1997, nor was he on board any chartered aircraft that landed in or departed from Cebu during the relevant dates, except the 5 p.m. You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. flight on July 17, 1997 from Manila to Cebu.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the accused without reasonable doubt.

42 witnesses tapos wala naman record sa eroplano na sumakay sya after nang crime, omg hanep!

 

[JhanuzOne]

Ang hirap naman tlga nung kaso na yan, meron nga possibility na meron cover up kasi yung pamilya nang biktima ay promenente diba? Anu ba yung mga suspect, magkakilala ba sila nang mga biktima? Sorry di ako pwede mag yôutubê ngayun.

wait basahin ko nalang sa wikipedia

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.



42 witnesses tapos wala naman record sa eroplano na sumakay sya after nang crime, omg hanep!

Di ba? Sabi nabayaran yung judge pero nakonsensya kaya di pinadeath penalty silang anim..tapos biglang nagpakamatay yung judge kaso may ebidensya na pinapatay ito at pinamukhang suicide

 

[gerryansaudi]

Sabi kay sir raffy tulfo suicide daw.

 

[cookiecha321]

Ang hirap naman tlga nung kaso na yan, meron nga possibility na meron cover up kasi yung pamilya nang biktima ay promenente diba? Anu ba yung mga suspect, magkakilala ba sila nang mga biktima? Sorry di ako pwede mag yôutubê ngayun.

wait basahin ko nalang sa wikipedia

You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.



42 witnesses tapos wala naman record sa eroplano na sumakay sya after nang crime, omg hanep!

yung wiki po ay di reliable source. anyway may naglabas din ng screencap reportingg the incident yungg day na capture ng dalawang sisters, attorney nag post, eh ang tanong reliable ba naman ba yung ngsend or di kaya fake? sa pov nya lumalabas pumapanig sya sa chiong at sinasabi nya na maybe daw il...legall na may ginawa both parties but who cares hahah ... sorry ganun yung labas sa akin .yan yung implication nya sa post nya and yes attorney sya.

 

[cookiecha321]

Di ba? Sabi nabayaran yung judge pero nakonsensya kaya di pinadeath penalty silang anim..tapos biglang nagpakamatay yung judge kaso may ebidensya na pinapatay ito at pinamukhang suicide

wag po kayong mag basa ng wiki jusko ang dali lang iedit yang page na yan hahahha... try to edit the oage and see sulat mo dun innocent si paco tinggnan mo maeedit yun

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

yung wiki po ay di reliable source. anyway may naglabas din ng screencap reportingg the incident yungg day na capture ng dalawang sisters, attorney nag post, eh ang tanong reliable ba naman ba yung ngsend or di kaya fake? sa pov nya lumalabas pumapanig sya sa chiong at sinasabi nya na maybe daw il...legall na may ginawa both parties but who cares hahah ... sorry ganun yung labas sa akin .yan yung implication nya sa post nya and yes attorney sya.

Yung pelikula din naman at yung documentary, everything is not reliable kasi di naman tayo involved at wala tayo dun. At bakit mo ba sinasabi na naniniwala na ako kaagad?

Also alam ko yung sistema nang wikipedia.

 

[litedrive]

wag po kayong mag basa ng wiki jusko ang dali lang iedit yang page na yan hahahha... try to edit the oage and see sulat mo dun innocent si paco tinggnan mo maeedit yun

Yes, Wikipedia's reliability varies a lot. People can mess around, provide false information, vandalize an article or make a propaganda. But it will be verified by the community. Information will be assessed, fact checked and verified.

Also, it has guidelines on how to handle "Opinions", this way the editors' opinion won't affect the actual facts presented on each article.

Don't ignore the footnotes. These are the external reference used on the article.

References:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

 

[cookiecha321]

Yes, Wikipedia's reliability varies a lot. People can mess around, provide false information, vandalize an article or make a propaganda. But it will be verified by the community. Information will be assessed, fact checked and verified.

Also, it has guidelines on how to handle "Opinions", this way the editors' opinion won't affect the actual facts presented on each article.

Don't ignore the footnotes. These are the external reference used on the article.

References:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

stil not reliable akhit ano pa nakasulat jan my professors prohibit to use the rrferences of wiki

 

[litedrive]

stil not reliable akhit ano pa nakasulat jan my professors prohibit to use the rrferences of wiki

Some of my professors would consider it reliable, some wouldn't.
Really, it's up for you to decide which is reliable, an opinion, factual, lies, or just satire. That is why references are cited on the footnotes.

Let's take this article for example:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Reliable or not?

Qouting what you have said "stil not reliable akhit ano pa nakasulat jan". Okay then.

 

[cookiecha321]

Some of my professors would consider it reliable, some wouldn't.
Really, it's up for you to decide which is reliable, an opinion, factual, lies, or just satire. That is why references are cited on the footnotes.

Let's take this article for example:
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.

Reliable or not?

Qouting what you have said "stil not reliable akhit ano pa nakasulat jan". Okay then.

ewan ko lang. kasi sa panahon ko nung college they would advise against it. so nag iba na pala panahon ngayon? eh di okay haha ang sinasabi ko lang why would i force myself to believe that website if may ibang sources hindi ba? tried to edit wiki haha pwedeng pwede pa rin ma edit yung downside lang makikita yng ip addressand that's it. have you even tried it? guess nit lol

 

[litedrive]

Such an insight

stil not reliable akhit ano pa nakasulat jan my professors prohibit to use the rrferences of wiki

Such an insghtful argument /s. You're missing the big picture

 

[litedrive]

ewan ko lang. kasi sa panahon ko nung college they would advise against it. so nag iba na pala panahon ngayon? eh di okay haha ang sinasabi ko lang why would i force myself to believe that website if may ibang sources hindi ba? tried to edit wiki haha pwedeng pwede pa rin ma edit yung downside lang makikita yng ip addressand that's it. have you even tried it? guess nit lol

Yes, things do change. Change is permanent. It was their "opinion" to not trust Wikipedia.


You are missing the point of thr term reference, no one is forcing you to believe them. References are there to support the article. Ever tried writing your own thesis? Dissertation? Did you even wonder whe there's this ting called "reference cited"? It is there to support everything you have written. You cannot simply spew out words and not back them up with serious.references, articles, studies or writings.

You always cite your professors or college experience. This is also "referencing".

have you even tried it? guess nit lol

Guess again.

 

[Delta India Charlie Kilo]

My sakit ata na TL;DR syndrome.

 

[cookiecha321]

Yes, things do change. Change is permanent. It was their "opinion" to not trust Wikipedia.


You are missing the point of thr term reference, no one is forcing you to believe them. References are there to support the article. Ever tried writing your own thesis? Dissertation? Did you even wonder whe there's this ting called "reference cited"? It is there to support everything you have written. You cannot simply spew out words and not back them up with serious.references, articles, studies or writings.

You always cite your professors or college experience. This is also "referencing".


Guess again.

ipaglaban mo yan. go wikipedia haha