What's new

Closed Why we should wí†hdráw from the icc

Status
Not open for further replies.
--In response to TypeSend's Topic regarding the ICC, I would like to clarify a few things to light up this topic for those who might have little to no knowledge about it.

*Let it be clear that I'm on the side of Progress for our nation and not on any Politician.

I think his knowledge on ICC is limited. He didn't provide any premise as to why our country would get worse if we get out of such organization.

To summarize, Here are a few facts about the ICC.

*It officially began functioning in 2001 but plans for its foundation started many years after the First world war. It is seated in Hague Netherlands.

*The ICC is intended to complement existing national judicial systems and it may therefore only exercise its jurisdiction when certain conditions are met, such as when national courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute criminals or when the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or individual states refer situations to the Court.

*Russia, China, India and the UNITED STATES are not members of the Statute. US and RUSSIA withdrew the ratification just a few days after signing.

* The biggest Financers of the ICC are the EU(European Union), Japan, and Australia.

*Most of the people convicted by the ICC are from small countries in Africa.

*The UK which is a member of the ICC is under Investigation for many years by the ICC for War Crimes and Crimes of aggression in the Middle East but even today, It seems there has been no Progress.

*I would also like to add that the number of people kill in America that is related to drugs reached an staggering 47,000 plus last year and THE WORLD DOESN'T EVEN KNOW OR SEEM TO CARE.

*The US committed many War crimes and Crimes of Aggression in Iraq and many Middle East countries. One such example is the footage of the Baghdad strike that was released by WikiLeaks. And the ICC didn't even lift a finger or say a word about it.

To conclude, I don't think it would have a significant impact on our country if we were to wí†hdráw. In fact, it would even benefit us. The Philippines contribute a considerable amount of money for the ICC as a member. Moreover, we already have a prevailing justice system and even superpowers aren't part of it. Poor African countries are mainly the one that usually get prosecuted by the Rome Statute.

What do you think? Let me know your thoughts.

If you find any grammatical errors or wrong information, please tell me or the admins to edit it.

Refer to this page for more information.
You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now.
 
TBH DU30 started this sh!tfest and the opposition knew that DU30 is easily triggered by media critics specially if the report is against him.
Yan ang strength ni duterte good or bad publicity makakatulong sa kanya dDuterte is a phenom president no to mention galing pang Mindanao wala na siguro magkakaron ng katulad nya
 
ICC is virtually useless in a sense that it has no enforcement body. A law you can't enforce is nothing but a piece of crap. Tama din na madaming war crimes where they seem to have turned a blind eye and yet here they are trying to meddle with our country's issues.

sama sila sa wave ni duterte makikilala nga namn sila pag sumawsaw
 
Wag natin kalimutan at alam natin na hindi pantay ang hustisya sa bansa natin.. Ang hustisyang nakasanayan natin ay para lamang sa mayayaman.. Hustisya ito ng mga naghaharing uri,mayayaman at makapangyarihan. Nakaupo at may kayamanan.
Bakit kailangan pa mahawakan ng nakaupo ang judiciary kung naniniwala kayo gumagana ang justice system sa bansa,?

Alam naman ninyo na ang bansang ito ay kaya nakakasurvive ay dahil sa mga ofw natin at hindi mismo sa loob ng ekonomiya natin. Ang sambayanan ang nagbibigay buhay sa isang bansa na tama lang na bigyan ng gobyerno ito ng proteksyon.Hindi natin kayang tumayo sa sariling ekonomiya ng bansa. Umaasa at pinaasa tayo sa dayuhan.

Walang problema kumalas dito kung hindi natin kailangan mag palabas pa ng pilipino at dito na magtatrabaho.
Walang problema kumalas kung ang hustisya dito ay walang kinikilingan.
Walang problema kumalas kung walang ganid sa pera at kapangyarihan.

Kaya pala laki ng natulong ng ICC sa mga OFW natin kawawa mga ofw natin eh ngayun ko nga lang narining yang ICC na yan umepal lang kay DUTERTE!
 
Ah sangayon ka na magamitan tayo ng political influence ?
Di naman ata patas yon
kahit ayaw natin, ganito ang takbo ng mga utak ng pulitiko sa bansa. Dahil sa sobra nila ka adik sa posisyon. Gagawin ang lahat para mapaupo lang. Ganid para magpayaman
Kaya nga wala ko kinikilingan politiko at galit ako dito.. Baka ikaw pa, DDS ka e
 
Hindi ako pabor na umalis tayo.

-Andyan ang ICC para protektahan ang mga mamayan kung sakaling wala na tayong makuhang hustisya laban sa ating sariling pamahalaan.
*The ICC is intended to complement existing national judicial systems and it may therefore only exercise its jurisdiction when certain conditions are met, such as when national courts are unwilling or unable to prosecute criminals or when the You do not have permission to view the full content of this post. Log in or register now. or individual states refer situations to the Court.

*Most of the people convicted by the ICC are from small countries in Africa.

Kahit na maliliit na bansa lang yung nakakabuti parin sa mga mamayan doon ang pagconvict sa kanilang mga leaders.

*I would also like to add that the number of people kill in America that is related to drugs reached an staggering 47,000 plus last year and THE WORLD DOESN'T EVEN KNOW OR SEEM TO CARE.
-kahit ilang milyon o ilang libo lang yan hindi ibig sabihin na tama ang ginagawa nila. Marami pa rin po ang adik sa America. Kahit sa Colombia ang ganitong estilo nang pagpuksa sa problema nang droga ay hindi maganda ang kinahangtungan.
with your respect boss sa haba ng post mo para mo na ding sinabi sa conclusion mo na walang silbi ang icc
 
Sa tingin ko hindi pa talaga perfect ang sistema ng ICC pero maganda naman hangarin nito. Pero sana di ginawang example ni TS ang US kasi di naman sila member ng ICC. Kung totoong ung ibang members nga di maimbestigahan eh pano pa nga ung hindi members.
 
Sa tingin ko hindi pa talaga perfect ang sistema ng ICC pero maganda naman hangarin nito. Pero sana di ginawang example ni TS ang US kasi di naman sila member ng ICC. Kung totoong ung ibang members nga di maimbestigahan eh pano pa nga ung hindi members.

Kaya ko po sinali ang US para ma elaborate kung gaano ka unfair ang International laws. Kung wala kang power, wala kang magagawa. Kung tutuosin, and UK na miyembro ng ICC, ang daming crimes of aggression sa Middle East ngunit ang mga tao lamang sa maliliit na bansa.. Na walang impluwensya ang nasisira.
 
Inisa isa ko nga tapos conclusion mo walang silbi?
may problema ba sa post ko boss? pakibasa ng post mo from the beginning up to the last at intindihn mong mabuti kung ano ang ni conclude mo.. di ba para mo na ding sinabi na walang silbi ang icc?

*I would also like to add that the number of people kill in America that is related to drugs reached an staggering 47,000 plus last year and THE WORLD DOESN'T EVEN KNOW OR SEEM TO CARE.
-kahit ilang milyon o ilang libo lang yan hindi ibig sabihin na tama ang ginagawa nila. Marami pa rin po ang adik sa America. Kahit sa Colombia ang ganitong estilo nang pagpuksa sa problema nang droga ay hindi maganda ang kinahangtungan.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Back
Top